Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

"I'm sorry to hear that": Finding New Biases in Language Models with a Holistic Descriptor Dataset

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.09209 v2 pith:Q52O4YE7 submitted 2022-05-18 cs.CL cs.CY

classification cs.CLcs.CY
keywords biasmodelsbiasesdatasetdemographicholisticbiaslanguageaxes
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

As language models grow in popularity, it becomes increasingly important to clearly measure all possible markers of demographic identity in order to avoid perpetuating existing societal harms. Many datasets for measuring bias currently exist, but they are restricted in their coverage of demographic axes and are commonly used with preset bias tests that presuppose which types of biases models can exhibit. In this work, we present a new, more inclusive bias measurement dataset, HolisticBias, which includes nearly 600 descriptor terms across 13 different demographic axes. HolisticBias was assembled in a participatory process including experts and community members with lived experience of these terms. These descriptors combine with a set of bias measurement templates to produce over 450,000 unique sentence prompts, which we use to explore, identify, and reduce novel forms of bias in several generative models. We demonstrate that HolisticBias is effective at measuring previously undetectable biases in token likelihoods from language models, as well as in an offensiveness classifier. We will invite additions and amendments to the dataset, which we hope will serve as a basis for more easy-to-use and standardized methods for evaluating bias in NLP models.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Adultification Bias in LLMs and Text-to-Image Models

    cs.CY 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Large language and text-to-image models show measurable adultification bias, portraying Black girls as more mature, culpable, and sexualized than White girls in several tested models.

  2. BiasFilter: An Inference-Time Debiasing Framework for Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    BiasFilter filters low-fairness segments during LLM generation using a reward model trained on a GPT-4-scored preference dataset, cutting bias on CEB and FairMT.

Pith tools