Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Non-Autoregressive Neural Machine Translation: A Call for Clarity

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.10577 v2 pith:OK437JOX submitted 2022-05-21 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords translationbleunon-autoregressivebeenmodelsoutputqualityseveral
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Non-autoregressive approaches aim to improve the inference speed of translation models by only requiring a single forward pass to generate the output sequence instead of iteratively producing each predicted token. Consequently, their translation quality still tends to be inferior to their autoregressive counterparts due to several issues involving output token interdependence. In this work, we take a step back and revisit several techniques that have been proposed for improving non-autoregressive translation models and compare their combined translation quality and speed implications under third-party testing environments. We provide novel insights for establishing strong baselines using length prediction or CTC-based architecture variants and contribute standardized BLEU, chrF++, and TER scores using sacreBLEU on four translation tasks, which crucially have been missing as inconsistencies in the use of tokenized BLEU lead to deviations of up to 1.7 BLEU points. Our open-sourced code is integrated into fairseq for reproducibility.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. PIER: A Novel Metric for Evaluating What Matters in Code-Switching

    cs.CL 2025-01 reject novelty 3.0 of 10

    PIER is a WER variant restricted to tagged points of interest and is proposed as a more honest evaluation of code-switched ASR.

Pith tools