Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Denoising gravitational-wave signals from binary black holes with dilated convolutional autoencoder

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.13513 v1 pith:QU5TXHIO submitted 2022-05-26 gr-qc astro-ph.IM

classification gr-qcastro-ph.IM
keywords signalsdenoisinggravitational-waveastrophysicalconvolutionalnoiseartifactsautoencoder
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Broadband frequency output of gravitational-wave detectors is a non-stationary and non-Gaussian time series data stream dominated by noise populated by local disturbances and transient artifacts, which evolve on the same timescale as the gravitational-wave signals and may corrupt the astrophysical information. We study a denoising algorithm dedicated to expose the astrophysical signals by employing a convolutional neural network in the encoder-decoder configuration, i.e. apply the denoising procedure of coalescing binary black hole signals in the publicly available LIGO O1 time series strain data. The denoising convolutional autoencoder neural network is trained on a dataset of simulated astrophysical signals injected into the real detector's noise and a dataset of detector noise artifacts ("glitches"), and its fidelity is tested on real gravitational-wave events from O1 and O2 LIGO-Virgo observing runs.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robustness of Sensitivity Evaluations for Gravitational Wave Detection Algorithms

    gr-qc 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    AresGW model 1's injection detection count at a false-alarm rate of 1/month varies with noise dataset by up to 39% coefficient of variation, while sensitive distance varies by only a few percent.

Pith tools