Pith. sign in

REVIEW

VectorAdam for Rotation Equivariant Geometry Optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.13599 v4 pith:3FMWIVKY submitted 2022-05-26 cs.LG cs.CVcs.GR

classification cs.LGcs.CVcs.GR
keywords optimizationadamequivariantgeometryproblemsrotationtraditionalvectoradam
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The Adam optimization algorithm has proven remarkably effective for optimization problems across machine learning and even traditional tasks in geometry processing. At the same time, the development of equivariant methods, which preserve their output under the action of rotation or some other transformation, has proven to be important for geometry problems across these domains. In this work, we observe that Adam $-$ when treated as a function that maps initial conditions to optimized results $-$ is not rotation equivariant for vector-valued parameters due to per-coordinate moment updates. This leads to significant artifacts and biases in practice. We propose to resolve this deficiency with VectorAdam, a simple modification which makes Adam rotation-equivariant by accounting for the vector structure of optimization variables. We demonstrate this approach on problems in machine learning and traditional geometric optimization, showing that equivariant VectorAdam resolves the artifacts and biases of traditional Adam when applied to vector-valued data, with equivalent or even improved rates of convergence.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools