REVIEW 3 cited by
Fairness in Recommendation: Foundations, Methods and Applications
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
As one of the most pervasive applications of machine learning, recommender systems are playing an important role on assisting human decision making. The satisfaction of users and the interests of platforms are closely related to the quality of the generated recommendation results. However, as a highly data-driven system, recommender system could be affected by data or algorithmic bias and thus generate unfair results, which could weaken the reliance of the systems. As a result, it is crucial to address the potential unfairness problems in recommendation settings. Recently, there has been growing attention on fairness considerations in recommender systems with more and more literature on approaches to promote fairness in recommendation. However, the studies are rather fragmented and lack a systematic organization, thus making it difficult to penetrate for new researchers to the domain. This motivates us to provide a systematic survey of existing works on fairness in recommendation. This survey focuses on the foundations for fairness in recommendation literature. It first presents a brief introduction about fairness in basic machine learning tasks such as classification and ranking in order to provide a general overview of fairness research, as well as introduce the more complex situations and challenges that need to be considered when studying fairness in recommender systems. After that, the survey will introduce fairness in recommendation with a focus on the taxonomies of current fairness definitions, the typical techniques for improving fairness, as well as the datasets for fairness studies in recommendation. The survey also talks about the challenges and opportunities in fairness research with the hope of promoting the fair recommendation research area and beyond.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Fair-Count-Min: Frequency Estimation under Equal Group-wise Approximation Factor
Fair-Count-Min partitions Count-Min columns among groups, allocating columns by group size for one hash row and by a binomial-minimum equation for multiple rows, aiming to equalize expected approximation factors.
-
Improving Recommendation Fairness via Graph Structure and Representation Augmentation
FairDDA improves group fairness in GCN recommenders via dual data augmentation (edge pruning and feature masking) plus HSIC debiasing, with reported gains on two datasets.
-
Understanding Accuracy-Fairness Trade-offs in Re-ranking through Elasticity in Economics
Re-ranking accuracy-fairness trade-offs are modeled as commodity-tax transfer, with an EF-Curve metric family and ElasticRank algorithm built on utility elasticity.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.