Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2205.13748 v2 pith:LZZAXJOT submitted 2022-05-27 cs.LG

Auto-PINN: Understanding and Optimizing Physics-Informed Neural Architecture

classification cs.LG
keywords pinnsneuralauto-pinnsearcharchitectureaccuracyhyperparameterhyperparameters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) are revolutionizing science and engineering practice by bringing together the power of deep learning to bear on scientific computation. In forward modeling problems, PINNs are meshless partial differential equation (PDE) solvers that can handle irregular, high-dimensional physical domains. Naturally, the neural architecture hyperparameters have a large impact on the efficiency and accuracy of the PINN solver. However, this remains an open and challenging problem because of the large search space and the difficulty of identifying a proper search objective for PDEs. Here, we propose Auto-PINN, the first systematic, automated hyperparameter optimization approach for PINNs, which employs Neural Architecture Search (NAS) techniques to PINN design. Auto-PINN avoids manually or exhaustively searching the hyperparameter space associated with PINNs. A comprehensive set of pre-experiments using standard PDE benchmarks allows us to probe the structure-performance relationship in PINNs. We find that the different hyperparameters can be decoupled, and that the training loss function of PINNs is a good search objective. Comparison experiments with baseline methods demonstrate that Auto-PINN produces neural architectures with superior stability and accuracy over alternative baselines.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics-Audited Agentic Discovery in Scientific Machine Learning

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A verification-first agentic workflow for SciML surrogate discovery adds per-candidate, machine-checkable physics audits that expose a causality failure an error-only baseline misses.

  2. A Simple but Efficient Transformer-Based Physics-Informed Neural Network for Incompressible Navier--Stokes Equations

    physics.flu-dyn 2026-01 unverdicted novelty 4.0

    PhysicsFormer applies a lightweight Transformer PINN with pseudo-sequential representations to convection, Burgers, lid-driven cavity, and inverse Navier-Stokes problems, reporting near-zero error in parameter identif...

  3. Physics-Informed Neural Networks in Clean Combustion: A Pathway to Sustainable Aerospace Propulsion

    physics.flu-dyn 2025-09 conditional novelty 3.0

    A review article argues physics-informed neural networks are a faster, more data-efficient route to clean combustion modeling, but its 'transformative' thesis is undercut by its own scaling caveats and duplicated sections.