REVIEW 7 cited by
Primordial black hole mergers from three-body interactions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Current gravitational-wave observations set the most stringent bounds on the abundance of primordial black holes (PBHs) in the solar mass range. This constraint, however, inherently relies on the merger rate predicted by PBH models. Previous analyses have focused mainly on two binary formation mechanisms: early Universe assembly out of decoupling from the Hubble expansion and dynamical capture in present-day dark matter structures. Using reaction rates of three-body processes studied in the astrophysical context, we show that, under conservative assumptions, three-body interactions in PBH halos efficiently produce binaries. Those binaries form at high redshift in Poisson-induced PBH small-scale structures and a fraction is predicted to coalesce and merge within the current age of the Universe, at odds with the dynamical capture scenario where they merge promptly. In general, we find that this channel predicts rates comparable to the dynamical capture scenario. However, binaries formed from three-body interactions do not significantly contribute to the overall PBH merger rate unless PBHs made up a dominant fraction of the dark matter above the solar mass range, a scenario that is ruled out by current constraints. Our results support strong bounds on the PBH abundance in the stellar mass range derived from Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory/Virgo/KAGRA observations. Finally, we show that both dynamical channels are always subdominant compared to early Universe assembly for PBH mergers in the asteroid mass range, while we expect it to become relevant in scenarios where PBHs are initially strongly clustered.
Forward citations
Cited by 7 Pith papers
-
Evolution of a black hole cluster in full general relativity
A 25-black-hole cluster evolved in full general relativity undergoes runaway hierarchical merging into a single roughly 22m0 black hole, ejects one member at 0.51c, and produces a gravitational-wave signal with an ecc...
-
Reconstruction of Primordial Power Spectrum from Gravitational Waves of High-Redshift Black Hole Binaries
Gradient-descent inversion of redshifted BBH mass distributions recovers the PBH mass function and, via regularized Press-Schechter, a candidate O(10^{-2}) bump in the small-scale primordial power spectrum.
-
Do Primordial Black Hole Clusters Survive the Galaxy? Collisional Disruption and Microlensing Implications
Cluster-cluster collisions strip 50–96% of 10^6–10^7 M⊙ PBH cluster mass by z=0, so microlensing sightlines to the Magellanic Clouds are ~49–92% smooth.
-
Probing Primordial Black Hole Mergers in Clusters with Pulsar Timing Data
Bayesian analysis of IPTA DR2 shows scalar-induced gravitational waves dominate and PBH merger backgrounds are strongly disfavored relative to an astrophysical SMBHB explanation.
-
Implications for Pulsar Timing Arrays of Sub-solar Black Hole Detections: From LVK to Einstein Telescope and Cosmic Explorer
A Bayesian analysis shows that a future sub-solar PBH detection would make the primordial SIGW interpretation of PTA data favored over the SMBH interpretation, but this preference is driven by the detection prior.
-
A fast deep-learning approach to probing primordial black hole populations in gravitational wave events
A neural network maps single-event gravitational-wave posterior samples to joint PBH population posteriors in about one second on a GPU, with calibration matching MCMC on simulated catalogs.
-
January Food Benchmark (JFB): A Public Benchmark Dataset and Evaluation Suite for Multimodal Food Analysis
The abstract promises a food-image benchmark and a winning model, but the manuscript pages contain only a different paper on primordial black holes, leaving every benchmark claim unsubstantiated.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.