Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Interpretability Guarantees with Merlin-Arthur Classifiers

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.00759 v3 pith:ZTNJYBHT submitted 2022-06-01 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords guaranteesagentsinteractiveinterpretabilityboundsfeaturesinformationmerlin-arthur
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

We propose an interactive multi-agent classifier that provides provable interpretability guarantees even for complex agents such as neural networks. These guarantees consist of lower bounds on the mutual information between selected features and the classification decision. Our results are inspired by the Merlin-Arthur protocol from Interactive Proof Systems and express these bounds in terms of measurable metrics such as soundness and completeness. Compared to existing interactive setups, we rely neither on optimal agents nor on the assumption that features are distributed independently. Instead, we use the relative strength of the agents as well as the new concept of Asymmetric Feature Correlation which captures the precise kind of correlations that make interpretability guarantees difficult. We evaluate our results on two small-scale datasets where high mutual information can be verified explicitly.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Avoiding Obfuscation with Prover-Estimator Debate

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 8.0 of 10

    Prover-estimator debate replaces the opponent's choice of subclaim with probability estimates, and the paper claims this avoids obfuscation, though the proof of the core indistinguishability lemma is flawed.

Pith tools