Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Spam Detection Using BERT

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.02443 v2 pith:CAHCEFWI submitted 2022-06-06 cs.CR cs.LG

classification cs.CRcs.LG
keywords spamcorpusemailsdetectorbertlikesmssbuild
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Emails and SMSs are the most popular tools in today communications, and as the increase of emails and SMSs users are increase, the number of spams is also increases. Spam is any kind of unwanted, unsolicited digital communication that gets sent out in bulk, spam emails and SMSs are causing major resource wastage by unnecessarily flooding the network links. Although most spam mail originate with advertisers looking to push their products, some are much more malicious in their intent like phishing emails that aims to trick victims into giving up sensitive information like website logins or credit card information this type of cybercrime is known as phishing. To countermeasure spams, many researches and efforts are done to build spam detectors that are able to filter out messages and emails as spam or ham. In this research we build a spam detector using BERT pre-trained model that classifies emails and messages by understanding to their context, and we trained our spam detector model using multiple corpuses like SMS collection corpus, Enron corpus, SpamAssassin corpus, Ling-Spam corpus and SMS spam collection corpus, our spam detector performance was 98.62%, 97.83%, 99.13% and 99.28% respectively. Keywords: Spam Detector, BERT, Machine learning, NLP, Transformer, Enron Corpus, SpamAssassin Corpus, SMS Spam Detection Corpus, Ling-Spam Corpus.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Comprehensive Analysis of Adversarial Attacks against Spam Filters

    cs.CR 2025-05 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A benchmark showing that simple black-box perturbations, especially out-of-vocabulary word replacement and AI-generated paragraphs, can sharply reduce the accuracy of deep learning spam filters, with a proposed unigra...

  2. SpaLLM-Guard: Pairing SMS Spam Detection Using Open-source and Commercial LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-01 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    Fine-tuned Mixtral outperforms zero-shot and few-shot LLM prompting for SMS spam detection, reaching 98.6% accuracy on a balanced test set, though the evaluation protocol has methodological weaknesses.

Pith tools