Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Overcoming the Long Horizon Barrier for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Latent Low-Rank Structure

Machine Learning · Submitted 7 Jun 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim We subsequently show that under stronger low rank structural assumptions, given access to a generative model, Low Rank Monte Carlo Policy Iteration (LR-MCPI) and Low Rank Empirical Value Iteration (LR-EVI) achieve the desired sample complexity of $\tilde{O}\left((|S|+|A|)\mathrm{poly}(d,H)/\epsilon^2\right)$ for a rank $d$ setting, which is minimax optimal with respect to the scaling of $|S|, |A|$, and $\epsilon$.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2206.03569 (version 4)
Pith IDFL2Y4ZKX, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationChristina Lee Yu, Tyler Sam, Yudong Chen. "Overcoming the Long Horizon Barrier for Sample-Efficient Reinforcement Learning with Latent Low-Rank Structure." arXiv:2206.03569 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/FL2Y4ZKX
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,426 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.07 · states limitation 0.83 · human participants 0.02 · controlled comparison 0.06 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.88 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v4. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

The practicality of reinforcement learning algorithms has been limited due to poor scaling with respect to the problem size, as the sample complexity of learning an $\epsilon$-optimal policy is $\tilde{\Omega}\left(|S||A|H^3 / \epsilon^2\right)$ over worst case instances of an MDP with state space $S$, action space $A$, and horizon $H$. We consider a class of MDPs for which the associated optimal $Q^*$ function is low rank, where the latent features are unknown. While one would hope to achieve linear sample complexity in $|S|$ and $|A|$ due to the low rank structure, we show that without imposing further assumptions beyond low rank of $Q^*$, if one is constrained to estimate the $Q$ function using only observations from a subset of entries, there is a worst case instance in which one must incur a sample complexity exponential in the horizon $H$ to learn a near optimal policy. We subsequently show that under stronger low rank structural assumptions, given access to a generative model, Low Rank Monte Carlo Policy Iteration (LR-MCPI) and Low Rank Empirical Value Iteration (LR-EVI) achieve the desired sample complexity of $\tilde{O}\left((|S|+|A|)\mathrm{poly}(d,H)/\epsilon^2\right)$ for a rank $d$ setting, which is minimax optimal with respect to the scaling of $|S|, |A|$, and $\epsilon$. In contrast to literature on linear and low-rank MDPs, we do not require a known feature mapping, our algorithm is computationally simple, and our results hold for long time horizons. Our results provide insights on the minimal low-rank structural assumptions required on the MDP with respect to the transition kernel versus the optimal action-value function.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 The practicality of reinforcement learning algorithms has been limited due to poor scaling with respect to the problem size, as the sample complexity of learning an $\epsilon$-optimal policy is $\tilde{\Omega}\left(|S||A|H^3 / \epsilon^2\right)$ over worst case instances of an MDP with state space $S$, action space $A$, and horizon $H$. background 1.00 0.06 0.04 asserted 1.00
s1 We consider a class of MDPs for which the associated optimal $Q^*$ function is low rank, where the latent features are unknown. contribution 0.49 0.22 0.04 asserted 0.87
s2 While one would hope to achieve linear sample complexity in $|S|$ and $|A|$ due to the low rank structure, we show that without imposing further assumptions beyond low rank of $Q^*$, if one is constrained to estimate the $Q$ function using only observations from a subset of entries, there is a worst case instance in which one must incur a sample complexity exponential in the horizon $H$ to learn a near optimal policy. result 0.87 0.87 0.18 asserted 1.00
s3 We subsequently show that under stronger low rank structural assumptions, given access to a generative model, Low Rank Monte Carlo Policy Iteration (LR-MCPI) and Low Rank Empirical Value Iteration (LR-EVI) achieve the desired sample complexity of $\tilde{O}\left((|S|+|A|)\mathrm{poly}(d,H)/\epsilon^2\right)$ for a rank $d$ setting, which is minimax optimal with respect to the scaling of $|S|, |A|$, and $\epsilon$. result 0.67 0.94 0.63 asserted 1.00
s4 In contrast to literature on linear and low-rank MDPs, we do not require a known feature mapping, our algorithm is computationally simple, and our results hold for long time horizons. contribution 0.96 0.84 0.14 asserted 1.00
s5 Our results provide insights on the minimal low-rank structural assumptions required on the MDP with respect to the transition kernel versus the optimal action-value function. interpretation 0.97 0.80 0.12 asserted 0.85

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.84 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v4
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

The practicality of reinforcement learning algorithms has been limited due to poor scaling with respect to the problem size, as the sample complexity of learning an $\epsilon$-optimal policy is $\tilde{\Omega}\left(|S||A|H^3 / \epsilon^2\right)$ over worst case instances of an MDP with state space $S$, action space $A$, and horizon $H$. We consider a class of MDPs for which the associated optimal $Q^*$ function is low rank, where the latent features are unknown. While one would hope to achieve linear sample complexity in $|S|$ and $|A|$ due to the low rank structure, we show that without imposing further assumptions beyond low rank of $Q^*$, if one is constrained to estimate the $Q$ function using only observations from a subset of entries, there is a worst case instance in which one must incur a sample complexity exponential in the horizon $H$ to learn a near optimal policy. We subsequently show that under stronger low rank structural assumptions, given access to a generative model, Low Rank Monte Carlo Policy Iteration (LR-MCPI) and Low Rank Empirical Value Iteration (LR-EVI) achieve the desired sample complexity of $\tilde{O}\left((|S|+|A|)\mathrm{poly}(d,H)/\epsilon^2\right)$ for a rank $d$ setting, which is minimax optimal with respect to the scaling of $|S|, |A|$, and $\epsilon$. In contrast to literature on linear and low-rank MDPs, we do not require a known feature mapping, our algorithm is computationally simple, and our results hold for long time horizons. Our results provide insights on the minimal low-rank structural assumptions required on the MDP with respect to the transition kernel versus the optimal action-value function.

Human review
How the literature uses it

2 arXiv papers cite this in 2 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 1 sentence without a confident label

Cites it as background 1 paper

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper
Cites as background 2 papers

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.