Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Towards Understanding Why Mask-Reconstruction Pretraining Helps in Downstream Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.03826 v5 pith:B42O3C4O submitted 2022-06-08 cs.LG cs.CVcs.NEstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CVcs.NEstat.ML
keywords featurespretrainingdownstreamdatasetencodersemantictasksthen
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

For unsupervised pretraining, mask-reconstruction pretraining (MRP) approaches, e.g. MAE and data2vec, randomly mask input patches and then reconstruct the pixels or semantic features of these masked patches via an auto-encoder. Then for a downstream task, supervised fine-tuning the pretrained encoder remarkably surpasses the conventional ``supervised learning'' (SL) trained from scratch. However, it is still unclear 1) how MRP performs semantic feature learning in the pretraining phase and 2) why it helps in downstream tasks. To solve these problems, we first theoretically show that on an auto-encoder of a two/one-layered convolution encoder/decoder, MRP can capture all discriminative features of each potential semantic class in the pretraining dataset. Then considering the fact that the pretraining dataset is of huge size and high diversity and thus covers most features in downstream dataset, in fine-tuning phase, the pretrained encoder can capture as much features as it can in downstream datasets, and would not lost these features with theoretical guarantees. In contrast, SL only randomly captures some features due to lottery ticket hypothesis. So MRP provably achieves better performance than SL on the classification tasks. Experimental results testify to our data assumptions and also our theoretical implications.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Robust Adaptation of Foundation Models with Black-Box Visual Prompting

    cs.CV 2024-07 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    BlackVIP adapts foundation models via a Coordinator for input-dependent visual prompts and SPSA-GC for gradient estimation, enabling robust transfer on 19 datasets with low memory use and a link to randomized smoothin...

Pith tools