REVIEW 1 cited by
Explainable AI for High Energy Physics
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Neural Networks are ubiquitous in high energy physics research. However, these highly nonlinear parameterized functions are treated as \textit{black boxes}- whose inner workings to convey information and build the desired input-output relationship are often intractable. Explainable AI (xAI) methods can be useful in determining a neural model's relationship with data toward making it \textit{interpretable} by establishing a quantitative and tractable relationship between the input and the model's output. In this letter of interest, we explore the potential of using xAI methods in the context of problems in high energy physics.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Applicability Evaluation of Selected xAI Methods for Machine Learning Algorithms for Signal Parameters Extraction
Occlusion sensitivity, not gradient-based saliency, best reveals how a convolutional autoencoder recognizes scintillator pulses; the paper ties the loss minimum to kernel size and estimates 30 ns minimum pulse separation.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.