Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

AI Ethics Issues in Real World: Evidence from AI Incident Database

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.07635 v2 pith:CSYXBAPT submitted 2022-06-15 cs.AI cs.CY

classification cs.AIcs.CY
keywords issuesethicsethicalrealworlddatabasedifferentguidelines
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

With the powerful performance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) also comes prevalent ethical issues. Though governments and corporations have curated multiple AI ethics guidelines to curb unethical behavior of AI, the effect has been limited, probably due to the vagueness of the guidelines. In this paper, we take a closer look at how AI ethics issues take place in real world, in order to have a more in-depth and nuanced understanding of different ethical issues as well as their social impact. With a content analysis of AI Incident Database, which is an effort to prevent repeated real world AI failures by cataloging incidents, we identified 13 application areas which often see unethical use of AI, with intelligent service robots, language/vision models and autonomous driving taking the lead. Ethical issues appear in 8 different forms, from inappropriate use and racial discrimination, to physical safety and unfair algorithm. With this taxonomy of AI ethics issues, we aim to provide AI practitioners with a practical guideline when trying to deploy AI applications ethically.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Red Light, Grey Zone: A Multi-Perspective Interactive Narrative for Autonomous Driving Ethics

    cs.CY 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 12-participant study suggests that a multi-perspective interactive narrative can encourage non-experts to reason about autonomous-driving ethics as distributed responsibility rather than single-actor blame.

  2. The Only Way is Ethics: A Guide to Ethical Research with Large Language Models

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A practitioner-focused guide that distills existing AI ethics literature into actionable Do's and Don'ts for each stage of LLM research projects.

Pith tools