REVIEW 1 cited by
A Numerical Reasoning Question Answering System with Fine-grained Retriever and the Ensemble of Multiple Generators for FinQA
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
A Numerical Reasoning Question Answering System with Fine-grained Retriever and the Ensemble of Multiple Generators for FinQA
read the original abstract
The numerical reasoning in the financial domain -- performing quantitative analysis and summarizing the information from financial reports -- can greatly increase business efficiency and reduce costs of billions of dollars. Here, we propose a numerical reasoning question answering system to answer numerical reasoning questions among financial text and table data sources, consisting of a retriever module, a generator module, and an ensemble module. Specifically, in the retriever module, in addition to retrieving the whole row data, we innovatively design a cell retriever that retrieves the gold cells to avoid bringing unrelated and similar cells in the same row to the inputs of the generator module. In the generator module, we utilize multiple generators to produce programs, which are operation steps to answer the question. Finally, in the ensemble module, we integrate multiple programs to choose the best program as the output of our system. In the final private test set in FinQA Competition, our system obtains 69.79 execution accuracy.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Program of Thoughts Prompting: Disentangling Computation from Reasoning for Numerical Reasoning Tasks
PoT prompting improves numerical reasoning by having language models write programs executed by a computer instead of performing calculations in natural language chains of thought, with an average 12% gain over CoT.
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.