Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Using Sum-Product Networks to Assess Uncertainty in Deep Active Learning

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.09798 v2 pith:D2P4AIIV submitted 2022-06-20 cs.LG cs.ITmath.IT

classification cs.LGcs.ITmath.IT
keywords uncertaintyactivedeeplearningacquisitionclasscomputingdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The success of deep active learning hinges on the choice of an effective acquisition function, which ranks not yet labeled data points according to their expected informativeness. Many acquisition functions are (partly) based on the uncertainty that the current model has about the class label of a point, yet there is no generally agreed upon strategy for computing such uncertainty. This paper proposes a new and very simple approach to computing uncertainty in deep active learning with a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN). The main idea is to use the feature representation extracted by the CNN as data for training a Sum-Product Network (SPN). Since SPNs are typically used for estimating the distribution of a dataset, they are well suited to the task of estimating class probabilities that can be used directly by standard acquisition functions such as max entropy and variational ratio. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated in an experimental study on several standard benchmark datasets for image classification, where we compare it to various state-of-the-art methods for assessing uncertainty in deep active learning.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-Factor: Quality Is a Dataset-Intrinsic Property

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across 2,500 class-balanced MNIST subsets and 10 model architectures, test-error Z-scores correlate strongly across models (mean R2=0.82 excluding GNB), supporting dataset quality as an intrinsic property.

Pith tools