REVIEW 1 cited by
FedBC: Calibrating Global and Local Models via Federated Learning Beyond Consensus
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
In this work, we quantitatively calibrate the performance of global and local models in federated learning through a multi-criterion optimization-based framework, which we cast as a constrained program. The objective of a device is its local objective, which it seeks to minimize while satisfying nonlinear constraints that quantify the proximity between the local and the global model. By considering the Lagrangian relaxation of this problem, we develop a novel primal-dual method called Federated Learning Beyond Consensus (\texttt{FedBC}). Theoretically, we establish that \texttt{FedBC} converges to a first-order stationary point at rates that matches the state of the art, up to an additional error term that depends on a tolerance parameter introduced to scalarize the multi-criterion formulation. Finally, we demonstrate that \texttt{FedBC} balances the global and local model test accuracy metrics across a suite of datasets (Synthetic, MNIST, CIFAR-10, Shakespeare), achieving competitive performance with state-of-the-art.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Modular Federated Learning: A Meta-Framework Perspective
A 63-page survey that reframes federated learning as a composition of eight modules and proposes an 'alignment operator' taxonomy, while surveying Python FL frameworks and open challenges.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.