RECORD
Quasi-bound state in the $\bar{K}NNN$ system
Nuclear Theory · Submitted 29 Jun 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The resulting binding energies $B^{\rm Chiral}_{K^-ppn} \sim 30.5 - 34.5$ MeV obtained with chirally motivated and $B^{\rm SIDD}_{K^-ppn} \sim 46.4 - 52.0$ MeV obtained with phenomenological antikaon-nucleon potentials are close to those obtained for the $K^- pp$ system with the same $\bar{K}N$ and $NN$ potentials, while the four-body widths $\Gamma_{K^- ppn} \sim 38.2 - 50.9$ MeV are smaller.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The paper is devoted to the $\bar{K}NNN$ system, which is an exotic system consisting of an antikaon and three nucleons. Dynamically exact four-body Faddeev-type equations were solved and characteristics of the quasi-bound state in the system were evaluated. Three antikaon-nucleon and three nucleon-nucleon potentials were used, so the dependence of the four-body pole positions on the two-body interaction models was studied. The resulting binding energies $B^{\rm Chiral}_{K^-ppn} \sim 30.5 - 34.5$ MeV obtained with chirally motivated and $B^{\rm SIDD}_{K^-ppn} \sim 46.4 - 52.0$ MeV obtained with phenomenological antikaon-nucleon potentials are close to those obtained for the $K^- pp$ system with the same $\bar{K}N$ and $NN$ potentials, while the four-body widths $\Gamma_{K^- ppn} \sim 38.2 - 50.9$ MeV are smaller.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The paper is devoted to the $\bar{K}NNN$ system, which is an exotic system consisting of an antikaon and three nucleons. | background 0.73 | 0.17 | 0.03 | asserted 0.98 |
| s1 | Dynamically exact four-body Faddeev-type equations were solved and characteristics of the quasi-bound state in the system were evaluated. | method 0.77 | 0.94 | 0.12 | asserted 1.00 |
| s2 | Three antikaon-nucleon and three nucleon-nucleon potentials were used, so the dependence of the four-body pole positions on the two-body interaction models was studied. | method 0.96 | 0.89 | 0.04 | asserted 0.99 |
| s3 | The resulting binding energies $B^{\rm Chiral}_{K^-ppn} \sim 30.5 - 34.5$ MeV obtained with chirally motivated and $B^{\rm SIDD}_{K^-ppn} \sim 46.4 - 52.0$ MeV obtained with phenomenological antikaon-nucleon potentials are close to those obtained for the $K^- pp$ system with the same $\bar{K}N$ and $NN$ potentials, while the four-body widths $\Gamma_{K^- ppn} \sim 38.2 - 50.9$ MeV are smaller. | result 1.00 | 0.93 | 0.71 | asserted 1.00 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v1
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The paper is devoted to the $\bar{K}NNN$ system, which is an exotic system consisting of an antikaon and three nucleons. Dynamically exact four-body Faddeev-type equations were solved and characteristics of the quasi-bound state in the system were evaluated. Three antikaon-nucleon and three nucleon-nucleon potentials were used, so the dependence of the four-body pole positions on the two-body interaction models was studied. The resulting binding energies $B^{\rm Chiral}_{K^-ppn} \sim 30.5 - 34.5$ MeV obtained with chirally motivated and $B^{\rm SIDD}_{K^-ppn} \sim 46.4 - 52.0$ MeV obtained with phenomenological antikaon-nucleon potentials are close to those obtained for the $K^- pp$ system with the same $\bar{K}N$ and $NN$ potentials, while the four-body widths $\Gamma_{K^- ppn} \sim 38.2 - 50.9$ MeV are smaller.
Human review
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.