Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Euclid preparation: XXIII. Derivation of galaxy physical properties with deep machine learning using mock fluxes and H-band images

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.14944 v2 pith:CP7NSR6P submitted 2022-06-29 astro-ph.GA

Euclid preparation: XXIII. Derivation of galaxy physical properties with deep machine learning using mock fluxes and H-band images

Euclid Collaboration: L. Bisigello , C.J. Conselice , M. Baes , M. Bolzonella , M. Brescia , S. Cavuoti , O. Cucciati , A. Humphrey
show 190 more authors
L. K. Hunt C. Maraston L. Pozzetti C. Tortora S.E. van Mierlo N. Aghanim N. Auricchio M. Baldi R. Bender C. Bodendorf D. Bonino E. Branchini J. Brinchmann S. Camera V. Capobianco C. Carbone J. Carretero F.J. Castander M. Castellano A. Cimatti G. Congedo L. Conversi Y. Copin L. Corcione F. Courbin M. Cropper A. Da Silva H. Degaudenzi M. Douspis F. Dubath C.A.J. Duncan X. Dupac S. Dusini S. Farrens S. Ferriol M. Frailis E. Franceschi P. Franzetti M. Fumana B. Garilli W. Gillard B. Gillis C. Giocoli A. Grazian F. Grupp L. Guzzo S.V.H. Haugan W. Holmes F. Hormuth A. Hornstrup K. Jahnke M. K\"ummel S. Kermiche A. Kiessling M. Kilbinger R. Kohley M. Kunz H. Kurki-Suonio S. Ligori P. B. Lilje I. Lloro E. Maiorano O. Mansutti O. Marggraf K. Markovic F. Marulli R. Massey S. Maurogordato E. Medinaceli M. Meneghetti E. Merlin G. Meylan M. Moresco L. Moscardini E. Munari S.M. Niemi C. Padilla S. Paltani F. Pasian K. Pedersen V. Pettorino G. Polenta M. Poncet L. Popa F. Raison A. Renzi J. Rhodes G. Riccio H.-W. Rix E. Romelli M. Roncarelli C. Rosset E. Rossetti R. Saglia D. Sapone B. Sartoris P. Schneider M. Scodeggio A. Secroun G. Seidel C. Sirignano G. Sirri L. Stanco P. Tallada-Cresp\'i D. Tavagnacco A.N. Taylor I. Tereno R. Toledo-Moreo F. Torradeflot I. Tutusaus E.A. Valentijn L. Valenziano T. Vassallo Y. Wang A. Zacchei G. Zamorani J. Zoubian S. Andreon S. Bardelli A. Boucaud C. Colodro-Conde D. Di Ferdinando J. Graci\'a-Carpio V. Lindholm D. Maino S. Mei V. Scottez F. Sureau M. Tenti E. Zucca A. S. Borlaff M. Ballardini A. Biviano E. Bozzo C. Burigana R. Cabanac A. Cappi C.S. Carvalho S. Casas G. Castignani A. Cooray J. Coupon H.M. Courtois J. Cuby S. Davini G. De Lucia G. Desprez H. Dole J.A. Escartin S. Escoffier M. Farina S. Fotopoulou K. Ganga J. Garcia-Bellido K. George F. Giacomini G. Gozaliasl H. Hildebrandt I. Hook M. Huertas-Company V. Kansal E. Keihanen C.C. Kirkpatrick A. Loureiro J.F. Mac\'ias-P\'erez M. Magliocchetti G. Mainetti S. Marcin M. Martinelli N. Martinet R.B. Metcalf P. Monaco G. Morgante S. Nadathur A.A. Nucita L. Patrizii A. Peel D. Potter A. Pourtsidou M. P\"ontinen P. Reimberg A.G. S\'anchez Z. Sakr M. Schirmer E. Sefusatti M. Sereno J. Stadel R. Teyssier C. Valieri J. Valiviita M. Viel
This is my paper
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxieslearningdeepeuclidmethodspropertiesstellarwell
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Next generation telescopes, like Euclid, Rubin/LSST, and Roman, will open new windows on the Universe, allowing us to infer physical properties for tens of millions of galaxies. Machine learning methods are increasingly becoming the most efficient tools to handle this enormous amount of data, because they are often faster and more accurate than traditional methods. We investigate how well redshifts, stellar masses, and star-formation rates (SFR) can be measured with deep learning algorithms for observed galaxies within data mimicking the Euclid and Rubin/LSST surveys. We find that Deep Learning Neural Networks and Convolutional Neutral Networks (CNN), which are dependent on the parameter space of the training sample, perform well in measuring the properties of these galaxies and have a better accuracy than methods based on spectral energy distribution fitting. CNNs allow the processing of multi-band magnitudes together with $H_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm E}$-band images. We find that the estimates of stellar masses improve with the use of an image, but those of redshift and SFR do not. Our best results are deriving i) the redshift within a normalised error of less than 0.15 for 99.9$\%$ of the galaxies with S/N>3 in the $H_{\scriptscriptstyle\rm E}$-band; ii) the stellar mass within a factor of two ($\sim0.3 \rm dex$) for 99.5$\%$ of the considered galaxies; iii) the SFR within a factor of two ($\sim0.3 \rm dex$) for $\sim$70$\%$ of the sample. We discuss the implications of our work for application to surveys as well as how measurements of these galaxy parameters can be improved with deep learning.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Star-forming clump detection in nearby galaxies using Faster R-CNN and $ugrizy$ imaging data from CLAUDS and HSC-SSP

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.5

    A multi-band Faster R-CNN with Zoobot backbone detects star-forming clumps in low-z galaxies at ≥0.9 completeness and ≥0.8 purity on simulated injections, yielding ~1.5M candidates.

  2. Star-forming clump detection in nearby galaxies using Faster R-CNN and $ugrizy$ imaging data from CLAUDS and HSC-SSP

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    A six-band Faster R-CNN with the Zoobot backbone detects star-forming clump candidates in ~700,000 local galaxies, claiming ~90% completeness and ~80% purity for clumps brighter than the surveys' detection limits.