REVIEW 2 cited by
Asimov: A framework for coordinating parameter estimation workflows
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Since the first detection in 2015 of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence, improvements to the Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo detectors have expanded our view into the universe for these signals. Searches of the of the latest observing run (O3) have increased the number of detected signals to 90, at a rate of approximately 1 per week. Future observing runs are expected to increase this even further. Bayesian analysis of the signals can reveal the properties of the coalescing black holes and neutron stars by comparing predicted waveforms to the observed data. The proliferating number of detected signals, the increasing number of methods that have been deployed, and the variety of waveform models create an ever-expanding number of analyses that can be considered. Asimov is a python package which is designed to simplify and standardise the process of configuring these analyses for a large number of events. It has already been used in developing analyses in three major gravitational wave catalog publications.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Searching for binary black hole mergers with deep learning in Advanced LIGO's third observing run
A hybrid matched-filter/deep-learning pipeline recovers 31 known O3 events and reports a new tentative high-mass candidate, with sensitivity comparable to existing searches only for chirp masses above 25 solar masses.
-
Efficient reanalysis of events from GWTC-3 with RIFT and asimov
A reproducible RIFT/asimov workflow reanalyzes GWTC-3 events with four waveform models, confirming broad agreement but exposing event-specific systematic disagreements, notably in GW200129.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.