Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Few-shot training LLMs for project-specific code-summarization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.04237 v2 pith:XNFEI2PN submitted 2022-07-09 cs.SE cs.LG

classification cs.SEcs.LG
keywords few-shotllmsproject-specificverytrainingcode-summarizationcodexlarge
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Very large language models (LLMs), such as GPT-3 and Codex have achieved state-of-the-art performance on several natural-language tasks, and show great promise also for code. A particularly exciting aspect of LLMs is their knack for few-shot and zero-shot learning: they can learn to perform a task with very few examples. Few-shotting has particular synergies in software engineering, where there are a lot of phenomena (identifier names, APIs, terminology, coding patterns) that are known to be highly project-specific. However, project-specific data can be quite limited, especially early in the history of a project; thus the few-shot learning capacity of LLMs might be very relevant. In this paper, we investigate the use few-shot training with the very large GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) Codex model, and find evidence suggesting that one can significantly surpass state-of-the-art models for code-summarization, leveraging project-specific training.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SwiftEval: Developing a Language-Specific Benchmark for LLM-generated Code Evaluation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    SwiftEval, a 28-problem hand-crafted Swift benchmark, evaluates 44 code LLMs and shows large performance drops on Swift tasks, especially for smaller models.

  2. A Causal Perspective on Measuring, Explaining and Mitigating Smells in LLM-Generated Code

    cs.SE 2025-11 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A probabilistic score of code-smell propensity in LLM output is validated, used in a causal analysis, and shown to drop when prompts explicitly discourage known smells.

Pith tools