Pith. Sign in

RECORD

TweetDIS: A Large Twitter Dataset for Natural Disasters Built using Weak Supervision

Computation and Language · Submitted 11 Jul 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim Our results demonstrate that models trained on the silver standard dataset achieved performance greater than 90% when classifying a manually curated, gold-standard dataset.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2207.04947 (version 1)
Pith IDI7HTN7OR, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationJuan M. Banda, Ramya Tekumalla. "TweetDIS: A Large Twitter Dataset for Natural Disasters Built using Weak Supervision." arXiv:2207.04947 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/I7HTN7OR
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 5,521 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.04 · states limitation 0.18 · human participants 0.26 · controlled comparison 0.14 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.98 · compares with prior results 0.15 · mentions code or data availability 0.96.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Social media is often utilized as a lifeline for communication during natural disasters. Traditionally, natural disaster tweets are filtered from the Twitter stream using the name of the natural disaster and the filtered tweets are sent for human annotation. The process of human annotation to create labeled sets for machine learning models is laborious, time consuming, at times inaccurate, and more importantly not scalable in terms of size and real-time use. In this work, we curate a silver standard dataset using weak supervision. In order to validate its utility, we train machine learning models on the weakly supervised data to identify three different types of natural disasters i.e earthquakes, hurricanes and floods. Our results demonstrate that models trained on the silver standard dataset achieved performance greater than 90% when classifying a manually curated, gold-standard dataset. To enable reproducible research and additional downstream utility, we release the silver standard dataset for the scientific community.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Social media is often utilized as a lifeline for communication during natural disasters. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 0.82
s1 Traditionally, natural disaster tweets are filtered from the Twitter stream using the name of the natural disaster and the filtered tweets are sent for human annotation. background 0.98 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s2 The process of human annotation to create labeled sets for machine learning models is laborious, time consuming, at times inaccurate, and more importantly not scalable in terms of size and real-time use. background 0.50 0.07 0.03 asserted 1.00
s3 In this work, we curate a silver standard dataset using weak supervision. contribution 0.57 0.96 0.08 asserted 0.99
s4 In order to validate its utility, we train machine learning models on the weakly supervised data to identify three different types of natural disasters i.e earthquakes, hurricanes and floods. method 0.87 0.95 0.06 asserted 0.76
s5 Our results demonstrate that models trained on the silver standard dataset achieved performance greater than 90% when classifying a manually curated, gold-standard dataset. result 1.00 0.97 0.69 asserted 1.00
s6 To enable reproducible research and additional downstream utility, we release the silver standard dataset for the scientific community. contribution 0.94 0.93 0.08 asserted 0.96

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: dataset or benchmark 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.75.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Social media is often utilized as a lifeline for communication during natural disasters. Traditionally, natural disaster tweets are filtered from the Twitter stream using the name of the natural disaster and the filtered tweets are sent for human annotation. The process of human annotation to create labeled sets for machine learning models is laborious, time consuming, at times inaccurate, and more importantly not scalable in terms of size and real-time use. In this work, we curate a silver standard dataset using weak supervision. In order to validate its utility, we train machine learning models on the weakly supervised data to identify three different types of natural disasters i.e earthquakes, hurricanes and floods. Our results demonstrate that models trained on the silver standard dataset achieved performance greater than 90% when classifying a manually curated, gold-standard dataset. To enable reproducible research and additional downstream utility, we release the silver standard dataset for the scientific community.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.