Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

An Empirical Evaluation of Four Off-the-Shelf Proprietary Visual-Inertial Odometry Systems

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.06780 v1 pith:IZWGKROR submitted 2022-07-14 cs.RO cs.CV

classification cs.ROcs.CV
keywords systemsaccuratecommercialconsistentfourindoorodometryoff-the-shelf
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Commercial visual-inertial odometry (VIO) systems have been gaining attention as cost-effective, off-the-shelf six degrees of freedom (6-DoF) ego-motion tracking methods for estimating accurate and consistent camera pose data, in addition to their ability to operate without external localization from motion capture or global positioning systems. It is unclear from existing results, however, which commercial VIO platforms are the most stable, consistent, and accurate in terms of state estimation for indoor and outdoor robotic applications. We assess four popular proprietary VIO systems (Apple ARKit, Google ARCore, Intel RealSense T265, and Stereolabs ZED 2) through a series of both indoor and outdoor experiments where we show their positioning stability, consistency, and accuracy. We present our complete results as a benchmark comparison for the research community.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. GLidE-SLAM: GL-Accelerated Indirect-Direct Embedded SLAM

    cs.RO 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    GLidE-SLAM moves pose-only photometric tracking to OpenGL ES compute shaders, reporting up to 9x faster frame rates than ORB-SLAM2 on embedded platforms with comparable ATE on TUM and EuRoC sequences.

Pith tools