Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

CheXplaining in Style: Counterfactual Explanations for Chest X-rays using StyleGAN

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2207.07553 v1 pith:M2LREJXO submitted 2022-07-15 eess.IV cs.CVcs.LG

classification eess.IVcs.CVcs.LG
keywords explanationscounterfactualchestmodelsx-raysblack-boxdiagnosisfeatures
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep learning models used in medical image analysis are prone to raising reliability concerns due to their black-box nature. To shed light on these black-box models, previous works predominantly focus on identifying the contribution of input features to the diagnosis, i.e., feature attribution. In this work, we explore counterfactual explanations to identify what patterns the models rely on for diagnosis. Specifically, we investigate the effect of changing features within chest X-rays on the classifier's output to understand its decision mechanism. We leverage a StyleGAN-based approach (StyleEx) to create counterfactual explanations for chest X-rays by manipulating specific latent directions in their latent space. In addition, we propose EigenFind to significantly reduce the computation time of generated explanations. We clinically evaluate the relevancy of our counterfactual explanations with the help of radiologists. Our code is publicly available.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Hide-and-Seek Attribution: Weakly Supervised Segmentation of Vertebral Metastases in CT

    cs.CV 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    Hide-and-Seek Attribution combined with a diffusion autoencoder converts coarse vertebra-level labels into accurate lytic and blastic lesion segmentations, reaching F1 scores of 0.91 and 0.85 without any mask supervision.

  2. Reliability, Faithfulness, and the Limits of Post-hoc Explanations of Opaque Scientific Models

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Reliability and faithfulness of post-hoc explanations do not suffice to support claims about how a scientific phenomenon is structured.

Pith tools