Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Is there evidence for exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.02199 v3 pith:2CPCNOMQ submitted 2022-08-03 physics.chem-ph quant-ph

classification physics.chem-phquant-ph
keywords quantumchemistryexponentialadvantageevidencepotentialapplicationacross
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The idea to use quantum mechanical devices to simulate other quantum systems is commonly ascribed to Feynman. Since the original suggestion, concrete proposals have appeared for simulating molecular and materials chemistry through quantum computation, as a potential ``killer application''. Indications of potential exponential quantum advantage in artificial tasks have increased interest in this application, thus, it is critical to understand the basis for potential exponential quantum advantage in quantum chemistry. Here we gather the evidence for this case in the most common task in quantum chemistry, namely, ground-state energy estimation. We conclude that evidence for such an exponential advantage across chemical space has yet to be found. While quantum computers may still prove useful for quantum chemistry, it may be prudent to assume exponential speedups are not generically available for this problem.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Pith tools