pith. sign in

arxiv: 2208.06471 · v5 · submitted 2022-08-12 · 🪐 quant-ph · physics.atom-ph

Multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment modeled (with additional appendices)

Lihong V. Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-24 11:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🪐 quant-ph physics.atom-ph
keywords Stern-Gerlach experimentco-quantum conceptelectron spinspin collapsebeam fractionsMajorana formulaRabi formulaquantum measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

The physical co-quantum concept accounts for multi-stage Stern-Gerlach observations by predicting beam fractions in absolute units with no parameter adjustment.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper aims to supply a physical mechanism for electron-spin collapse during sequential measurements in the classic multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment, where the Majorana and Rabi formulae diverge from recorded data. It advances the physical co-quantum concept as this mechanism. The concept is shown to generate the observed beam fractions exactly without any fitted parameters and with a p-value below one per million. It is further shown to reproduce the wave function, density operator, and uncertainty relation for electron spin.

Core claim

Introducing the physical co-quantum concept provides a plausible physical mechanism for the multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment and predicts the experimental observation in absolute units without fitting with a p-value less than one per million. The co-quantum concept is corroborated by statistically reproducing exactly the wave function, density operator, and uncertainty relation for electron spin.

What carries the argument

The physical co-quantum concept, an independent physical entity applied to the Stern-Gerlach apparatus to generate the observed beam fractions.

If this is right

  • The Majorana and Rabi formulae diverge from the data while the co-quantum approach matches it exactly.
  • The match is obtained in absolute units with no parameters adjusted.
  • The wave function, density operator, and uncertainty relation for electron spin are reproduced by the same rules.
  • The p-value below one per million indicates the match is unlikely to occur by chance alone.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The co-quantum rules might underlie the emergence of standard quantum features in sequential spin measurements.
  • The same concept could be checked for consistency in other atomic or quantum-optics setups that involve staged spin projections.
  • If the concept holds, it would supply a concrete physical account of spin-state reduction that standard postulates leave unspecified.

Load-bearing premise

The physical co-quantum concept is a valid independent physical entity whose rules can be applied to the Stern-Gerlach apparatus to generate the observed beam fractions without dependence on the target data.

What would settle it

A repetition of the multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment that produces beam fractions differing substantially from the absolute predictions of the co-quantum model.

read the original abstract

In the classic multi-stage Stern$-$Gerlach experiment conducted by Frisch and Segr\`e, the Majorana (Landau$-$Zener) and Rabi formulae diverge afar from the experimental observation while the physical mechanism for electron-spin collapse remains unidentified. Here, introducing the physical co-quantum concept provides a plausible physical mechanism and predicts the experimental observation in absolute units without fitting (i.e., no parameters adjusted) with a p-value less than one per million, which is the probability that the co-quantum theory happens to match the experimental observation purely by chance. Further, the co-quantum concept is corroborated by statistically reproducing exactly the wave function, density operator, and uncertainty relation for electron spin in Stern$-$Gerlach experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a new 'physical co-quantum' concept as a mechanism for electron-spin collapse in the multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment of Frisch and Segrè. It asserts that this concept yields an exact, parameter-free prediction of the observed beam fractions (in absolute units), reports a p-value < 10^{-6} against chance agreement, and additionally reproduces the standard quantum-mechanical wave function, density operator, and uncertainty relation for spin.

Significance. If the co-quantum postulates can be shown to be fixed and independent of the target Frisch-Segrè fractions, the work would supply a concrete physical mechanism for spin measurement outcomes together with a falsifiable, zero-parameter prediction; such a result would be of clear interest to quantum foundations. The additional claim of exact reproduction of the standard spin formalism is a further point of potential strength if the mapping is derived rather than stipulated.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central claim of a parameter-free prediction requires the co-quantum interaction/collapse rules to be stated explicitly and prior to any application to the Frisch-Segrè data. No such postulates (interaction Hamiltonian, statistical mapping, or collapse criterion) appear in the provided text, so the 'no parameters adjusted' assertion and the reported p-value cannot be verified.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the p-value < 10^{-6} is asserted without any description of the underlying statistical model, the null hypothesis, the number of independent trials, or the method used to compute the probability that the co-quantum theory matches the data by chance.
  3. [Main text] Main text (co-quantum definition): the physical co-quantum is introduced with the sole stated justification that it reproduces the target experimental fractions and the standard quantum spin formalism. This structure is consistent with a definition chosen to match the data rather than an independent derivation, directly undermining the 'parameter-free' and 'p-value' claims.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Title / appendices] The manuscript title mentions 'additional appendices' but the provided text does not indicate whether the appendices contain the missing explicit postulates or the p-value derivation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review. We agree that the co-quantum postulates must be stated explicitly and prior to the data application, and that the statistical details underlying the p-value claim require full specification. We will revise the manuscript to address these issues directly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / main text] Abstract and main text: the central claim of a parameter-free prediction requires the co-quantum interaction/collapse rules to be stated explicitly and prior to any application to the Frisch-Segrè data. No such postulates (interaction Hamiltonian, statistical mapping, or collapse criterion) appear in the provided text, so the 'no parameters adjusted' assertion and the reported p-value cannot be verified.

    Authors: We accept this criticism. Although the manuscript introduces the co-quantum concept as the mechanism that yields the exact, parameter-free match, the explicit interaction and collapse rules are not isolated and presented before the Frisch-Segrè analysis. In the revised version we will insert a dedicated subsection that enumerates the postulates (interaction rules, statistical mapping, and collapse criterion) at the outset of the main text, prior to any comparison with experiment. This will make the parameter-free character verifiable. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the p-value < 10^{-6} is asserted without any description of the underlying statistical model, the null hypothesis, the number of independent trials, or the method used to compute the probability that the co-quantum theory matches the data by chance.

    Authors: We agree that the statistical procedure is not described. The revised manuscript will contain an explicit account of the statistical model, the null hypothesis (random agreement with the observed beam fractions), the number of independent trials or measurements, and the precise method by which the probability p < 10^{-6} is obtained. This material will be placed in a new appendix so that the p-value claim can be independently checked. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Main text] Main text (co-quantum definition): the physical co-quantum is introduced with the sole stated justification that it reproduces the target experimental fractions and the standard quantum spin formalism. This structure is consistent with a definition chosen to match the data rather than an independent derivation, directly undermining the 'parameter-free' and 'p-value' claims.

    Authors: The co-quantum rules are fixed once and for all by the requirement that they furnish a physical mechanism for spin collapse; the same fixed rules then produce both the Frisch-Segrè fractions without adjustment and the standard spin formalism. Nevertheless, the present ordering may give the impression of a data-driven definition. We will therefore restructure the main text so that the postulates appear first as an independent proposal, followed by their application to the experiment and only then by the demonstration that they recover the quantum-mechanical results. This reordering will clarify that the rules are not chosen after the fact to fit the data. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity identified from provided text

full rationale

The abstract asserts that the co-quantum concept predicts the Frisch-Segrè fractions in absolute units with no parameters adjusted. No equations, definitions, or derivation steps are supplied in the visible text that would allow verification of self-definition, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The claim of independence is stated explicitly, and the paper positions the concept as supplying a prior physical mechanism rather than a post-hoc fit. Absent any quoted reduction showing the target data entering the postulates by construction, the derivation chain cannot be shown to collapse to its inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on the validity of a newly postulated co-quantum entity whose rules are not derived from prior physics and whose only reported support is the match to one historical dataset.

axioms (1)
  • ad hoc to paper The physical co-quantum concept exists and supplies the mechanism for electron-spin collapse in Stern-Gerlach experiments.
    Introduced in the abstract as the key new idea required to obtain the reported predictions.
invented entities (1)
  • physical co-quantum no independent evidence
    purpose: To provide a physical mechanism for spin collapse and to generate exact predictions for multi-stage Stern-Gerlach beam fractions.
    Postulated by the paper; no independent evidence or falsifiable signature outside the reported match is mentioned.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5647 in / 1507 out tokens · 26514 ms · 2026-05-24T11:55:15.500336+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

65 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik9(1), 349–352 (1922)

    Gerlach W, Stern O. Der experimentelle nachweis der richtungsquantelung im magnetfeld. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1922;9(1):349-52. doi: 10.1007/BF01326983

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01326983 1922

  2. [2]

    The Stern - Gerlach experiment revisited

    Schmidt-Böcking H, Schmidt L, Lüdde HJ, Trageser W, Templeton A, Sa uer T. The Stern - Gerlach experiment revisited. The European Physical Journal H. 2016;41(4):327- 64. doi: 10.1140/epjh/e2016-70053-2

    work page doi:10.1140/epjh/e2016-70053-2 2016

  3. [3]

    The Stern –Gerlach experiment at 100

    Castelvecchi D. The Stern –Gerlach experiment at 100. Nature Reviews Physics. 2022. doi: 10.1038/s42254-022-00436-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s42254-022-00436-4 2022

  4. [4]

    Quantentheoretische bemerkungen zum experiment von Stern und Gerlach

    Ei nstein A, Ehrenfest P. Quantentheoretische bemerkungen zum experiment von Stern und Gerlach. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1922;11(1):31-4. doi: 10.1007/BF01328398

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01328398 1922

  5. [5]

    The Stern–Gerlach experiment and the effects of spin relaxation

    Wennerström H, Westlund P-O. The Stern–Gerlach experiment and the effects of spin relaxation. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics. 2012;14(5):1677-84. doi: 10.1039/C2CP22173J

    work page doi:10.1039/c2cp22173j 2012

  6. [6]

    The pilot-wave perspective on spin

    Norsen T. The pilot-wave perspective on spin. Am J Phys. 2014;82(4):337-48

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    The Feynman Lectures on Physics

    Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands ML. The Feynman Lectures on Physics. Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.; 1963

    work page 1963

  8. [8]

    Über die einstellung der richtungsquantelung

    Phipps TE, Stern O. Über die einstellung der richtungsquantelung. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1932;73(3):185-91. doi: 10.1007/BF01351212

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01351212 1932

  9. [9]

    Über die einstellung der richtungsquantelung

    Frisch R, Segrè E. Über die einstellung der richtungsquantelung. II. Zeitschrift für Physik. 1933;80(9):610-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01335699

    work page doi:10.1007/bf01335699 1933

  10. [10]

    Atomi orientati in campo magnetico variabile

    Majorana E. Atomi orientati in campo magnetico variabile. Il Nuovo Cimento (1924- 1942). 1932;9(2):43-50. doi: 10.1007/BF02960953

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02960953 1924

  11. [11]

    Oriented atoms in a variable magnetic field

    Majorana E. Oriented atoms in a variable magnetic field. In: Bassani G, editor. Ettore Majorana: Scientific Papers. Bologna, Berlin: Società Italian die Fisica and Springer; 2006. p. 125-32

    work page 2006

  12. [12]

    Zur theorie der energieubertragung

    Landau L. Zur theorie der energieubertragung. II. Physikalische Zeitschrift der Sowjetunion. 1932;2:46–51

    work page 1932

  13. [13]

    Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels

    Zener C. Non-adiabatic crossing of energy levels. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A. 1932;137:696

    work page 1932

  14. [14]

    Theorie der unelastischen Stösse zwischen atomen

    Stueckelberg ECG. Theorie der unelastischen Stösse zwischen atomen. Helvetica Physica Acta. 1932;5:369

    work page 1932

  15. [15]

    Nonadiabatic Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference

    Ivakhnenko OV, Shevchenko SN, Nori F. Nonadiabatic Landau–Zener–Stückelberg–Majorana transitions, dynamics, and interference. Physics Reports. 2023;995:1- 89. doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.10.002 2023

  16. [16]

    On the process of space quantization

    Rabi II. On the process of space quantization. Physical Review. 1936;49(4):324- 8. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.49.324

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.49.324 1936

  17. [17]

    Derivation from Bloch Equation to von Neumann Equation to Schrödinger –Pauli Equation

    Wang LV. Derivation from Bloch Equation to von Neumann Equation to Schrödinger –Pauli Equation. Found Phys. 2022;52(3):61

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Present status and future challenges of non- interferometric tests of collapse models

    Carlesso M, Donadi S, Ferialdi L, Paternostro M, Ulbricht H, Bassi A. Present status and future challenges of non- interferometric tests of collapse models. Nature Physics. 2022. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41567-021-01489-5 2022

  19. [19]

    Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems

    Ghirardi GC, Rimini A, Weber T. Unified dynamics for microscopic and macroscopic systems. Phys Rev D. 1986;34(2):470-91. doi: 10.1103/physrevd.34.470

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.34.470 1986

  20. [20]

    Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization

    Pearle P. Combining stochastic dynamical state-vector reduction with spontaneous localization. Physical Review A. 1989;39(5):2277

    work page 1989

  21. [21]

    Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles

    Ghirardi GC, Pearle P, Rimini A. Markov processes in Hilbert space and continuous spontaneous localization of systems of identical particles. Physical Review A. 1990;42(1):78- 89. doi: 10.1103/physreva.42.78. 19

    work page doi:10.1103/physreva.42.78 1990

  22. [22]

    Principles and Procedures of Statistics

    Steel RGD, Torrie JH. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. New York: McGraw Hill; 1960

    work page 1960

  23. [23]

    A Course in Theoretical Statistics

    Rahman N. A Course in Theoretical Statistics. New York: Charles Griffin and Company; 1968

    work page 1968

  24. [24]

    The Jeffreys –Lindley paradox and discovery criteria in high energy physics

    Cousins RD. The Jeffreys –Lindley paradox and discovery criteria in high energy physics. Synthese. 2017;194(2):395-432

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102 , keywords =

    Abbott BP, Abbott R, Abbott TD, Abernathy MR, Acernese F, Ackley K, et al. Observation of Gravitation al Waves from a Binary Black Hole Merger. Phys Rev Lett. 2016;116(6). doi: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.116.061102 2016

  26. [26]

    Introduction to Quantum Optics: from the Semi -classical Approach to Quantized Light

    Grynberg G, Aspect A, Fabre C. Introduction to Quantum Optics: from the Semi -classical Approach to Quantized Light. Cambridge University Press; 2010

    work page 2010

  27. [27]

    Geometrical representation of the Schrödinger equation for solving maser problems

    Feynman RP, Vernon Jr FL, Hellwarth RW. Geometrical representation of the Schrödinger equation for solving maser problems. Journal of applied physics. 1957;28(1):49-52

    work page 1957

  28. [28]

    A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materia ls

    Gilbert TL. A phenomenological theory of damping in ferromagnetic materia ls. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 2004;40(6):3443-9. doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2004.836740

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2004.836740 2004

  29. [29]

    https://periodic.lanl.gov/19.shtml Accessed

    Los Alamos National Laboratory: Periodic Table of Elements. https://periodic.lanl.gov/19.shtml Accessed

    work page

  30. [30]

    Foundations of Quantum Mechanics

    Norsen T. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Springer; 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [31]

    Introduction to Electrodynamics

    Griffiths DJ. Introduction to Electrodynamics. 4th ed. Cambridge University Press; 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Classical Electrodynamics

    Jackson JD. Classical Electrodynamics. USA: John Wiley & Sons; 1999

    work page 1999

  33. [33]

    What is spin? Am J Phys

    Ohanian HC. What is spin? Am J Phys. 1986;54(6):500-5. doi: 10.1119/1.14580

    work page doi:10.1119/1.14580 1986

  34. [34]

    Use of rotating coordinates in magnetic resonance problems

    Rabi II, Ramsey NF, Schwinger J. Use of rotating coordinates in magnetic resonance problems. Reviews of Modern Physics. 1954;26(2):167

    work page 1954

  35. [35]

    Time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy: History, technique, and application to supramolecular and macromolecular chemistry

    Forbes MD, Jarocha LE, Sim S, Tarasov VF. Time-resolved electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy: History, technique, and application to supramolecular and macromolecular chemistry. In: Williams IH, Williams NH, editors. Advances in Physical Organic Chemistry. Elsevier; 2013. p. 1-83

    work page 2013

  36. [36]

    Gas Phase NMR for the Study of Chemical Reactions: Kinetics and Product Identification

    Marchione AA, Conklin B. Gas Phase NMR for the Study of Chemical Reactions: Kinetics and Product Identification. In: Jackowski K, Jaszuński M, editors. Gas Phase NMR. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry; 2016. p. 126-51

    work page 2016

  37. [37]

    A s pin flipper for reversal of polarisation in a thermal atomic beam

    Schroder W, Baum G. A s pin flipper for reversal of polarisation in a thermal atomic beam. Journal of Physics E: Scientific Instruments. 1983;16(1):52

    work page 1983

  38. [38]

    Measurement of nuclear spin

    Breit G, Rabi I. Measurement of nuclear spin. Physical Review. 1931;38(11):2082

    work page 1931

  39. [39]

    Electron Spin Re sonance

    Barra AL, Hassan AK. Electron Spin Re sonance. In: Bassani F, Liedl GL, Wyder P, editors. Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2005. p. 58-67

    work page 2005

  40. [40]

    Is Quantum Theory Exact? Science

    Adler SL, Bassi A. Is Quantum Theory Exact? Science. 2009;325(5938):275- 6. doi: doi:10.1126/science.1176858

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1176858 2009

  41. [41]

    Making Sense of Quantum Mechanics

    Bricmont J. Making Sense of Quantum Mechanics. Springer; 2016

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? Cambridge University Press; 2019

    Laloë F. Do We Really Understand Quantum Mechanics? Cambridge University Press; 2019

    work page 2019

  43. [43]

    The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum: Interpretation and Foundations

    Auletta G. The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum: Interpretation and Foundations. Springer; 2019

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete

    Einstein A, Podolsky B, Rosen N. Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete. Physical Review. 1935;47(10):777-80. doi: 10.1103/PhysRev.47.777

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.47.777 1935

  45. [45]

    Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself

    Frauchiger D, Renner R. Quantum theory cannot consistently describe the use of itself. Nature Communications. 2018;9(1):3711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8 2018

  46. [46]

    Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik

    Schrödinger E. Die gegenwärtige situation in der quantenmechanik. Naturwissenschaften. 1935;23:807. 20

    work page 1935

  47. [47]

    Numerical m odeling of the multi - stage Stern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using co- quantum dynamics via the Bloch equation

    Titimbo K, Garrett DC, Kahraman SS, He Z, Wang LV. Numerical m odeling of the multi - stage Stern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using co- quantum dynamics via the Bloch equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:220813444. 2022

    work page 2022

  48. [48]

    Numerical modeling of the multi - stage St ern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using co -quantum dynamics via the Schrodinger equation

    He Z, Titimbo K, Garrett DC, Kahraman SS, Wang LV. Numerical modeling of the multi - stage St ern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using co -quantum dynamics via the Schrodinger equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:220814588. 2022

    work page 2022

  49. [49]

    Nuclear Induction

    Bloch F. Nuclear Induction. Physical Review. 1946;70(7- 8):460-74. doi: 10.1103/physrev.70.460

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.70.460 1946

  50. [50]

    Quantum mechanical modeling of the multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using the von Neumann equation

    Kahraman SS, Titimbo K, He Z, Shen J -T, Wang LV. Quantum mechanical modeling of the multi-stage Stern-Gerlach experiment by Frisch and Segre using the von Neumann equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:221011553. 2022

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    Double Stern- Gerlach experiments o n Mn@ Sn 12: Refocusing of a paramagnetic superatom

    Fuchs TM, Schäfer R. Double Stern- Gerlach experiments o n Mn@ Sn 12: Refocusing of a paramagnetic superatom. Physical Review A. 2018;98(6):063411

    work page 2018

  52. [52]

    Remarks concerning the essays brought together in this co- operative volume

    Einstein A. Remarks concerning the essays brought together in this co- operative volume. In: Schilpp PA, editor. Albert Einstein: Philosopher -Scientist. Library of Living Philosophers. La Salle: Open Court; 1949. p. 665-88

    work page 1949

  53. [53]

    Relativistic Quantum Mechanics

    Bjorken JD, Drell SD. Relativistic Quantum Mechanics. New York: Mcgraw -Hill College; 1964

    work page 1964

  54. [54]

    The magnetic moment of the K 39 nucleus

    Gibbons JJ, Bartlett JH. The magnetic moment of the K 39 nucleus. Physical Review. 1935;47(9):692-4. doi: 10.1103/physrev.47.692

    work page doi:10.1103/physrev.47.692 1935

  55. [55]

    Results of calculations of atomic wave functions

    Hartree DR. Results of calculations of atomic wave functions. II.—Results for K + and Cs+. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A. 1934;143(850):506-17

    work page 1934

  56. [56]

    The Landau−Zener formula

    Wittig C. The Landau−Zener formula. J Phys Chem B. 2005;109(17):8428- 30. doi: 10.1021/jp040627u

    work page doi:10.1021/jp040627u 2005

  57. [57]

    Majorana and condensed matter physics

    Wilczek F. Majorana and condensed matter physics. In: Esposito S, editor. The Physics of Ettore Majorana: Theoretical, Mathematical, and Phenomenological. Cambridge University Press

    work page

  58. [58]

    Majorana's approach to nonadiabatic transitions validates the adiabatic-impulse approximation

    Kofman PO, Ivakhnenko OV, Shevchenko SN, Nori F. Majorana's approach to nonadiabatic transitions validates the adiabatic-impulse approximation. arXiv preprint arXiv:220800481. 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Fundamentals of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information

    Lambropoulos P, Petrosyan D. Fundamentals of Quantum Optics and Quantum Information. Springer; 2007

    work page 2007

  60. [60]

    On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics

    Bell JS. On the problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics. Reviews of Modern Physics. 1966;38(3):447-52. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.38.447

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.38.447 1966

  61. [61]

    Bell correlations between spatially separated pairs of atoms

    Shin DK, Henson BM, Hodgman SS, Wasak T, Chwedeńczuk J, Truscott AG. Bell correlations between spatially separated pairs of atoms. Nature Communications. 2019;10(1). doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12192-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12192-8 2019

  62. [62]

    A matter wave Rarity -Tapster interferometer to demonstrate non -locality

    Thomas KF, Henson BM, Wang Y, Lewis-Swan RJ, Kheruntsyan KV, Hodgman SS, et al. A matter wave Rarity -Tapster interferometer to demonstrate non -locality. arXiv preprint arXiv:220608560. 2022

    work page 2022

  63. [64]

    Coincidentally, this solution differs from the Gaussian solution (Eq

    based on Hartree’s self-consistent field [55], we numerically reached 𝐵𝐵�⃗𝑛𝑛= 0.138𝜇𝜇0 𝜋𝜋𝑅𝑅3 𝜇𝜇⃗𝑛𝑛, (51) where the average radius is set to 𝑅𝑅. Coincidentally, this solution differs from the Gaussian solution (Eq. 50) by only 2%. Table S1. Normalized 𝑃𝑃(4𝑠𝑠) for potassium. 𝜓𝜓𝑟𝑟(0) = � 9.76 (4𝜋𝜋)⁄ and 𝜓𝜓𝑟𝑟(𝑟𝑟) = 𝑃𝑃� � 4𝜋𝜋𝑎𝑎0𝑟𝑟�⁄ for 𝑟𝑟> 0. [54] 𝒓𝒓𝒂𝒂𝟎𝟎⁄ 𝑷𝑷 ...

    work page 1967

  64. [65]

    up” for magnetic moment and hence “down

    (94) 33 Here, 𝐼𝐼 denotes the current carried by the wire along the −𝑥𝑥 axis, and 𝐵𝐵𝑟𝑟 (0.42 × 10−4 T) denotes the uniformly distributed remnant (residual) fringe magnetic flux density , which is parallel with the +𝑧𝑧 axis. The magnetic field generated by the wire cancels the remnant field at the null point (NP) to produce a n approximate quadrupole (Fig. ...

    work page

  65. [66]

    product state

    (179) The even split between the two ±𝑥𝑥 branches is because the heart shape associated with either of the ±𝑧𝑧 branches is rotationally symmetric about the 𝑧𝑧 axis. Thus, the wave function is |𝜇𝜇̂𝑒𝑒⟩𝑥𝑥= 1 √2 |+𝑥𝑥⟩ + 1 √2 exp(𝑖𝑖𝜙𝜙𝑒𝑒𝑥𝑥) |−𝑥𝑥⟩. (180) We derive the standard deviation, Δ𝑠𝑠𝑥𝑥, as follows: 〈𝑠𝑠𝑥𝑥〉 = − ℏ 2 � 1 √2� 2 + ℏ 2 � 1 √2� 2 = 0, (181) 〈𝑠𝑠𝑥...

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6455/acc149 2019