Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Fraud Dataset Benchmark and Applications

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2208.14417 v3 pith:NNHSS4VJ submitted 2022-08-30 cs.LG cs.CRstat.ML

classification cs.LGcs.CRstat.ML
keywords frauddetectiondatasetslearningapplicationsbenchmarkdatasetfeature
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Standardized datasets and benchmarks have spurred innovations in computer vision, natural language processing, multi-modal and tabular settings. We note that, as compared to other well researched fields, fraud detection has unique challenges: high-class imbalance, diverse feature types, frequently changing fraud patterns, and adversarial nature of the problem. Due to these, the modeling approaches evaluated on datasets from other research fields may not work well for the fraud detection. In this paper, we introduce Fraud Dataset Benchmark (FDB), a compilation of publicly available datasets catered to fraud detection FDB comprises variety of fraud related tasks, ranging from identifying fraudulent card-not-present transactions, detecting bot attacks, classifying malicious URLs, estimating risk of loan default to content moderation. The Python based library for FDB provides a consistent API for data loading with standardized training and testing splits. We demonstrate several applications of FDB that are of broad interest for fraud detection, including feature engineering, comparison of supervised learning algorithms, label noise removal, class-imbalance treatment and semi-supervised learning. We hope that FDB provides a common playground for researchers and practitioners in the fraud detection domain to develop robust and customized machine learning techniques targeting various fraud use cases.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Benchmarking Unsupervised Strategies for Anomaly Detection in Multivariate Time Series

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Across ten public datasets, a reconstruction-based inverted transformer with per-variate anomaly labelling achieves the best or tied best MCC on most datasets, but the comparison is weakened by test-set-based configur...

  2. Credit Card Fraud Detection Using RoFormer Model With Relative Distance Rotating Encoding

    cs.NE 2025-07 reject novelty 2.0 of 10

    Using real timestamps as rotary position angles in a RoFormer model gives 0.740 AUC on IEEE-CIS fraud detection, about 0.011 higher than the baseline.

Pith tools