Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Differential Privacy on Dynamic Data

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.01387 v3 pith:XKU7DSDH submitted 2022-09-03 cs.CR

Differential Privacy on Dynamic Data

classification cs.CR
keywords casedatadynamicconstructionsdatasetdifferentialprivacyproblem
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

A fundamental problem in differential privacy is to release a privatized data structure over a dataset that can be used to answer a class of linear queries with small errors. This problem has been well studied in the static case. In this paper, we consider the dynamic setting where items may be inserted into or deleted from the dataset over time, and we need to continually release data structures so that queries can be answered at any time. We present black-box constructions of such dynamic differentially private mechanisms from static ones with only a polylogarithmic degradation in the utility. For the fully-dynamic case, this is the first such result. For the insertion-only case, similar constructions are known, but we improve them over sparse update streams.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Edit-Neighboring Data Streams and Privacy under Continual Observation

    cs.DS 2026-07 accept novelty 8.0

    Under the new 'edit-neighboring' privacy definition, private continual counting is possible with only polylogarithmic error, while every additive-noise counter provably needs polynomial error.