Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Automatic counting of mounds on UAV images: combining instance segmentation and patch-level correction

Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · Submitted 6 Sep 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim The proposed method outperformed manual counting methods in terms of relative counting precision, indicating that it has the potential to be advantageous and efficient in difficult situations.

how it is stated · hedged possibility 0.67 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2209.02608 (version 1)
Pith IDOPKWCPX5, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAhmed Zgaren, Majid Nikougoftar Nategh, Nizar Bouguila, Wassim Bouachir. "Automatic counting of mounds on UAV images: combining instance segmentation and patch-level correction." arXiv:2209.02608 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/OPKWCPX5
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 7,603 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.15 · states limitation 0.71 · human participants 0.15 · controlled comparison 0.72 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.08 · compares with prior results 0.92 · mentions code or data availability 0.03.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v1. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Site preparation by mounding is a commonly used silvicultural treatment that improves tree growth conditions by mechanically creating planting microsites called mounds. Following site preparation, the next critical step is to count the number of mounds, which provides forest managers with a precise estimate of the number of seedlings required for a given plantation block. Counting the number of mounds is generally conducted through manual field surveys by forestry workers, which is costly and prone to errors, especially for large areas. To address this issue, we present a novel framework exploiting advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imaging and computer vision to accurately estimate the number of mounds on a planting block. The proposed framework comprises two main components. First, we exploit a visual recognition method based on a deep learning algorithm for multiple object detection by pixel-based segmentation. This enables a preliminary count of visible mounds, as well as other frequently seen objects (e.g. trees, debris, accumulation of water), to be used to characterize the planting block. Second, since visual recognition could limited by several perturbation factors (e.g. mound erosion, occlusion), we employ a machine learning estimation function that predicts the final number of mounds based on the local block properties extracted in the first stage. We evaluate the proposed framework on a new UAV dataset representing numerous planting blocks with varying features. The proposed method outperformed manual counting methods in terms of relative counting precision, indicating that it has the potential to be advantageous and efficient in difficult situations.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Site preparation by mounding is a commonly used silvicultural treatment that improves tree growth conditions by mechanically creating planting microsites called mounds. background 1.00 0.04 0.02 asserted 1.00
s1 Following site preparation, the next critical step is to count the number of mounds, which provides forest managers with a precise estimate of the number of seedlings required for a given plantation block. background 0.99 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 Counting the number of mounds is generally conducted through manual field surveys by forestry workers, which is costly and prone to errors, especially for large areas. background 0.76 0.06 0.02 asserted 1.00
s3 To address this issue, we present a novel framework exploiting advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imaging and computer vision to accurately estimate the number of mounds on a planting block. contribution 1.00 0.83 0.07 asserted 0.98
s4 The proposed framework comprises two main components. method 0.84 0.57 0.01 asserted 0.87
s5 First, we exploit a visual recognition method based on a deep learning algorithm for multiple object detection by pixel-based segmentation. method 0.99 0.84 0.02 asserted 0.99
s6 This enables a preliminary count of visible mounds, as well as other frequently seen objects (e.g. trees, debris, accumulation of water), to be used to characterize the planting block. method 0.97 0.68 0.03 asserted 0.96
s7 Second, since visual recognition could limited by several perturbation factors (e.g. mound erosion, occlusion), we employ a machine learning estimation function that predicts the final number of mounds based on the local block properties extracted in the first stage. method 0.99 0.91 0.05 hedged possibility 0.82
s8 We evaluate the proposed framework on a new UAV dataset representing numerous planting blocks with varying features. method 0.93 0.96 0.03 asserted 0.98
s9 The proposed method outperformed manual counting methods in terms of relative counting precision, indicating that it has the potential to be advantageous and efficient in difficult situations. result 0.71 0.94 0.89 hedged possibility 0.67

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: method or tool 1.00 · evidence from observation or experiment 0.94.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v1
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Site preparation by mounding is a commonly used silvicultural treatment that improves tree growth conditions by mechanically creating planting microsites called mounds. Following site preparation, the next critical step is to count the number of mounds, which provides forest managers with a precise estimate of the number of seedlings required for a given plantation block. Counting the number of mounds is generally conducted through manual field surveys by forestry workers, which is costly and prone to errors, especially for large areas. To address this issue, we present a novel framework exploiting advances in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) imaging and computer vision to accurately estimate the number of mounds on a planting block. The proposed framework comprises two main components. First, we exploit a visual recognition method based on a deep learning algorithm for multiple object detection by pixel-based segmentation. This enables a preliminary count of visible mounds, as well as other frequently seen objects (e.g. trees, debris, accumulation of water), to be used to characterize the planting block. Second, since visual recognition could limited by several perturbation factors (e.g. mound erosion, occlusion), we employ a machine learning estimation function that predicts the final number of mounds based on the local block properties extracted in the first stage. We evaluate the proposed framework on a new UAV dataset representing numerous planting blocks with varying features. The proposed method outperformed manual counting methods in terms of relative counting precision, indicating that it has the potential to be advantageous and efficient in difficult situations.

Human review

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.