REVIEW 2 cited by
The Ethical Need for Watermarks in Machine-Generated Language
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Watermarks should be introduced in the natural language outputs of AI systems in order to maintain the distinction between human and machine-generated text. The ethical imperative to not blur this distinction arises from the asemantic nature of large language models and from human projections of emotional and cognitive states on machines, possibly leading to manipulation, spreading falsehoods or emotional distress. Enforcing this distinction requires unintrusive, yet easily accessible marks of the machine origin. We propose to implement a code based on equidistant letter sequences. While no such code exists in human-written texts, its appearance in machine-generated ones would prove helpful for ethical reasons.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Enhancing Watermarking Quality for LLMs via Contextual Generation States Awareness
A context-aware plug-in for LLM watermarking that skips or weakens watermarks on semantically critical tokens, improving task accuracy at similar detection rates.
-
Temperature Matters: Enhancing Watermark Robustness Against Paraphrasing Attacks
A watermark that seeds each token's sampling temperature from a hash of the previous h tokens is claimed to beat the Aaronson watermark under a 30% BERT paraphrase attack, based on a single ROC curve without error bars.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.