Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Comparative Study on Unsupervised Anomaly Detection for Time Series: Experiments and Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.04635 v1 pith:ZITQZEGN submitted 2022-09-10 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords detectionanomalyseriestimedatamethodsevaluationstudies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The continued digitization of societal processes translates into a proliferation of time series data that cover applications such as fraud detection, intrusion detection, and energy management, where anomaly detection is often essential to enable reliability and safety. Many recent studies target anomaly detection for time series data. Indeed, area of time series anomaly detection is characterized by diverse data, methods, and evaluation strategies, and comparisons in existing studies consider only part of this diversity, which makes it difficult to select the best method for a particular problem setting. To address this shortcoming, we introduce taxonomies for data, methods, and evaluation strategies, provide a comprehensive overview of unsupervised time series anomaly detection using the taxonomies, and systematically evaluate and compare state-of-the-art traditional as well as deep learning techniques. In the empirical study using nine publicly available datasets, we apply the most commonly-used performance evaluation metrics to typical methods under a fair implementation standard. Based on the structuring offered by the taxonomies, we report on empirical studies and provide guidelines, in the form of comparative tables, for choosing the methods most suitable for particular application settings. Finally, we propose research directions for this dynamic field.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. SCAN: Enhance Time Series Anomaly Detection via Multi-Scale Neighborhood-Centered Clustering

    cs.LG 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    SCAN improves time series anomaly detection by integrating multi-scale clustering to guide reconstruction toward normal patterns and supply a dual anomaly criterion.

  2. Detecting the Undetectable: Enhancing Unsupervised time series Anomaly Detection via Active Learning

    cs.LG 2026-07 unverdicted novelty 4.0 of 10

    Active learning with masked reconstruction and minimax training raises AUC by 12.39% across 28 test cases on four multivariate datasets and seven unsupervised backbones.

Pith tools