REVIEW 2 cited by
Anomaly Detection under Coordinate Transformations
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
There is a growing need for machine learning-based anomaly detection strategies to broaden the search for Beyond-the-Standard-Model (BSM) physics at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) and elsewhere. The first step of any anomaly detection approach is to specify observables and then use them to decide on a set of anomalous events. One common choice is to select events that have low probability density. It is a well-known fact that probability densities are not invariant under coordinate transformations, so the sensitivity can depend on the initial choice of coordinates. The broader machine learning community has recently connected coordinate sensitivity with anomaly detection and our goal is to bring awareness of this issue to the growing high energy physics literature on anomaly detection. In addition to analytical explanations, we provide numerical examples from simple random variables and from the LHC Olympics Dataset that show how using probability density as an anomaly score can lead to events being classified as anomalous or not depending on the coordinate frame.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Theory-informed neural networks for particle physics
A Deep Q-Network using matrix-element rewards reconstructs parton assignments in collider events, enabling theory-based tagging and anomaly detection without labels.
-
Enhancing anomaly detection with topology-aware autoencoders
Autoencoders with latent spaces shaped like S^2, S^2×S^2, or RP^2, matched to the phase-space topology of the background, reduce spurious reconstruction errors and give a small but consistent anomaly-detection gain ov...
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.