RECORD
Stellar neutron capture reactions at low and high temperature
Nuclear Theory · Submitted 23 Sep 2022
abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review
The authors' main claim The determination of astrophysical reaction rates requires different approaches depending on the conditions in hydrostatic and explosive burning.
The compiled record
The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.
Open the compiled record
The abstract, sentence by sentence
The determination of astrophysical reaction rates requires different approaches depending on the conditions in hydrostatic and explosive burning. The focus here is on astrophysical reaction rates for radiative neutron capture reactions. Relevant nucleosynthesis processes not only involve the s-process but also the i-, r- and $\gamma$-processes, which from the nuclear perspective mainly differ in the relative interaction energies of neutrons and nuclei, and in the nuclear level densities of the involved nuclei. Emphasis is put on the difference between reactions at low and high temperature. Possible complications in the prediction and measurement of these reaction rates are illustrated and the connection between theory and experiment is addressed.
background contribution method result interpretation main claim
| # | sentence | role | the authors' own work | states the main conclusion | strength |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| s0 | The determination of astrophysical reaction rates requires different approaches depending on the conditions in hydrostatic and explosive burning. | background 1.00 | 0.07 | 0.06 | asserted 1.00 |
| s1 | The focus here is on astrophysical reaction rates for radiative neutron capture reactions. | contribution 0.65 | 0.20 | 0.05 | asserted 0.94 |
| s2 | Relevant nucleosynthesis processes not only involve the s-process but also the i-, r- and $\gamma$-processes, which from the nuclear perspective mainly differ in the relative interaction energies of neutrons and nuclei, and in the nuclear level densities of the involved nuclei. | background 1.00 | 0.06 | 0.07 | asserted 1.00 |
| s3 | Emphasis is put on the difference between reactions at low and high temperature. | contribution 0.93 | 0.19 | 0.10 | asserted 0.78 |
| s4 | Possible complications in the prediction and measurement of these reaction rates are illustrated and the connection between theory and experiment is addressed. | contribution 0.94 | 0.30 | 0.07 | asserted 0.57 |
What was examined, and what was not
- arXiv listing abstract v2
- full text
- figures and tables
- references and citing sentences
- relations to other papers
- P abstract
- S sections
- T body sentences
- C citations
- R cross-paper relations
The paper
Original abstract
The determination of astrophysical reaction rates requires different approaches depending on the conditions in hydrostatic and explosive burning. The focus here is on astrophysical reaction rates for radiative neutron capture reactions. Relevant nucleosynthesis processes not only involve the s-process but also the i-, r- and $\gamma$-processes, which from the nuclear perspective mainly differ in the relative interaction energies of neutrons and nuclei, and in the nuclear level densities of the involved nuclei. Emphasis is put on the difference between reactions at low and high temperature. Possible complications in the prediction and measurement of these reaction rates are illustrated and the connection between theory and experiment is addressed.
Human review
How the literature uses it
1 arXiv paper cite this in 1 sentence
Discussion
Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.