REVIEW 1 cited by
Recipro-CAM: Fast gradient-free visual explanations for convolutional neural networks
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
The Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) is a widely used deep learning architecture for computer vision. However, its black box nature makes it difficult to interpret the behavior of the model. To mitigate this issue, AI practitioners have explored explainable AI methods like Class Activation Map (CAM) and Grad-CAM. Although these methods have shown promise, they are limited by architectural constraints or the burden of gradient computing. To overcome this issue, Score-CAM and Ablation-CAM have been proposed as gradient-free methods, but they have longer execution times compared to CAM or Grad-CAM based methods, making them unsuitable for real-world solution though they resolved gradient related issues and enabled inference mode XAI. To address this challenge, we propose a fast gradient-free Reciprocal CAM (Recipro-CAM) method. Our approach involves spatially masking the extracted feature maps to exploit the correlation between activation maps and network predictions for target classes. Our proposed method has yielded promising results, outperforming current state-of-the-art method in the Average Drop-Coherence-Complexity (ADCC) metric by $1.78 \%$ to $3.72 \%$, excluding VGG-16 backbone. Moreover, Recipro-CAM generates saliency maps at a similar rate to Grad-CAM and is approximately $148$ times faster than Score-CAM. The source code for Recipro-CAM is available in our data analysis framework.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
MUPAX: Multidimensional Problem Agnostic eXplainable AI
MUPAX's feature importance is a weighted average of masked inputs selected for low loss, and its accuracy gains stem from using ground-truth labels during mask selection.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.