Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Implicit Bias of Large Depth Networks: a Notion of Rank for Nonlinear Functions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2209.15055 v4 pith:FFXQPV5F submitted 2022-09-29 stat.ML cs.AIcs.LG

classification stat.MLcs.AIcs.LG
keywords ranknetworksnonlinearbiasdepthdepthsfunctionsglobal
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
abstract

We show that the representation cost of fully connected neural networks with homogeneous nonlinearities - which describes the implicit bias in function space of networks with $L_2$-regularization or with losses such as the cross-entropy - converges as the depth of the network goes to infinity to a notion of rank over nonlinear functions. We then inquire under which conditions the global minima of the loss recover the `true' rank of the data: we show that for too large depths the global minimum will be approximately rank 1 (underestimating the rank); we then argue that there is a range of depths which grows with the number of datapoints where the true rank is recovered. Finally, we discuss the effect of the rank of a classifier on the topology of the resulting class boundaries and show that autoencoders with optimal nonlinear rank are naturally denoising.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Understanding Nonlinear Implicit Bias via Region Counts in Input Space

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Region count, the number of connected same-label regions along random input-space lines, correlates strongly with the generalization gap and is proposed as a reparameterization-invariant measure of nonlinear implicit bias.

Pith tools