REVIEW 2 cited by
Data Poisoning Attacks Against Multimodal Encoders
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recently, the newly emerged multimodal models, which leverage both visual and linguistic modalities to train powerful encoders, have gained increasing attention. However, learning from a large-scale unlabeled dataset also exposes the model to the risk of potential poisoning attacks, whereby the adversary aims to perturb the model's training data to trigger malicious behaviors in it. In contrast to previous work, only poisoning visual modality, in this work, we take the first step to studying poisoning attacks against multimodal models in both visual and linguistic modalities. Specially, we focus on answering two questions: (1) Is the linguistic modality also vulnerable to poisoning attacks? and (2) Which modality is most vulnerable? To answer the two questions, we propose three types of poisoning attacks against multimodal models. Extensive evaluations on different datasets and model architectures show that all three attacks can achieve significant attack performance while maintaining model utility in both visual and linguistic modalities. Furthermore, we observe that the poisoning effect differs between different modalities. To mitigate the attacks, we propose both pre-training and post-training defenses. We empirically show that both defenses can significantly reduce the attack performance while preserving the model's utility.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Backdoor Attack on Vision Language Models with Stealthy Semantic Manipulation
BadSem shows that semantic mismatches between images and text can serve as stealthy backdoor triggers for VLMs, achieving near-perfect attack success with low poisoning rates.
-
Where Do Backdoors Live? A Component-Level Analysis of Backdoor Propagation in Speech Language Models
Backdoors propagate through SLM components with persistence or erasure depending on the targeted part, and poisoned samples are not directly separable from benign ones in shared multitask embeddings.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.