REVIEW 2 cited by
SmallCap: Lightweight Image Captioning Prompted with Retrieval Augmentation
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Recent advances in image captioning have focused on scaling the data and model size, substantially increasing the cost of pre-training and finetuning. As an alternative to large models, we present SmallCap, which generates a caption conditioned on an input image and related captions retrieved from a datastore. Our model is lightweight and fast to train, as the only learned parameters are in newly introduced cross-attention layers between a pre-trained CLIP encoder and GPT-2 decoder. SmallCap can transfer to new domains without additional finetuning and can exploit large-scale data in a training-free fashion since the contents of the datastore can be readily replaced. Our experiments show that SmallCap, trained only on COCO, has competitive performance on this benchmark, and also transfers to other domains without retraining, solely through retrieval from target-domain data. Further improvement is achieved through the training-free exploitation of diverse human-labeled and web data, which proves to be effective for a range of domains, including the nocaps benchmark, designed to test generalization to unseen visual concepts.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
ViPCap: Retrieval Text-Based Visual Prompts for Lightweight Image Captioning
Retrieved text captions, encoded as sampled Gaussian features and fused with image patches, improve lightweight image captioning on COCO, Flickr30k, and NoCaps.
-
Composing Open-domain Vision with RAG for Ocean Monitoring and Conservation
Using CLIP image embeddings as retrieval keys and LLaVA as the answer generator, the paper reports 84% fish-classification accuracy on the FishNet dataset without domain-specific training.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.