Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

A Decade of Knowledge Graphs in Natural Language Processing: A Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.00105 v1 pith:RAQCXB5C submitted 2022-09-30 cs.CL cs.AI

Phillip Schneider , Tim Schopf , Juraj Vladika , Mikhail Galkin , Elena Simperl , Florian Matthes This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CLcs.AI
keywords researchgraphsknowledgelanguagenaturalprocessingsurveytasks
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In pace with developments in the research field of artificial intelligence, knowledge graphs (KGs) have attracted a surge of interest from both academia and industry. As a representation of semantic relations between entities, KGs have proven to be particularly relevant for natural language processing (NLP), experiencing a rapid spread and wide adoption within recent years. Given the increasing amount of research work in this area, several KG-related approaches have been surveyed in the NLP research community. However, a comprehensive study that categorizes established topics and reviews the maturity of individual research streams remains absent to this day. Contributing to closing this gap, we systematically analyzed 507 papers from the literature on KGs in NLP. Our survey encompasses a multifaceted review of tasks, research types, and contributions. As a result, we present a structured overview of the research landscape, provide a taxonomy of tasks, summarize our findings, and highlight directions for future work.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Generative Adversarial Reviews: When LLMs Become the Critic

    cs.CL 2024-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A new LLM-agent framework, GAR, generates peer reviews from a graph representation of manuscripts and predicts conference acceptance decisions, reportedly matching or exceeding human reviewer performance.

Pith tools