Pith. sign in

REVIEW

What shapes the loss landscape of self-supervised learning?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.00638 v2 pith:3FF5MV2Y submitted 2022-10-02 cs.LG physics.data-an

classification cs.LGphysics.data-an
keywords collapsedimensionaltheorywhatcauseslearninglossquestions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Prevention of complete and dimensional collapse of representations has recently become a design principle for self-supervised learning (SSL). However, questions remain in our theoretical understanding: When do those collapses occur? What are the mechanisms and causes? We answer these questions by deriving and thoroughly analyzing an analytically tractable theory of SSL loss landscapes. In this theory, we identify the causes of the dimensional collapse and study the effect of normalization and bias. Finally, we leverage the interpretability afforded by the analytical theory to understand how dimensional collapse can be beneficial and what affects the robustness of SSL against data imbalance.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools