Pith. Sign in

RECORD

Quantum communication complexity of linear regression

Quantum Physics · Submitted 4 Oct 2022

abstract compiled · 2026-09-23 · no language-model review

The authors' main claim In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems \update{if there is no restriction on the rank}.

how it is stated · asserted 1.00 read the record →

Comment (0) Read on arXiv ↗
Cite ▾
arXiv ID2210.01601 (version 2)
Pith IDZXMED7ZP, Pith's permanent record of this paper and its review
CitationAshley Montanaro, Changpeng Shao. "Quantum communication complexity of linear regression." arXiv:2210.01601 (2022). https://pith.science/paper/ZXMED7ZP
Claim paper

The compiled record

The paper's own sentences, arranged. Each label is drawn from a closed vocabulary; the number beside it is the probability the classifier gave that label. Numbers in the tables are the authors', checked by code. No sentence in this record was written by a model.

Open the compiled record

Compiled by classifier-1.13.0 via TypeSafe API, question bank abstract-p1-20260923, 2026-09-23: 1 request, 6,722 input tokens.

What the abstract itself states, as probabilities: claims first 0.05 · states limitation 0.68 · human participants 0.01 · controlled comparison 0.32 · randomized assignment 0.01 · states quantitative result 0.25 · compares with prior results 0.82 · mentions code or data availability 0.02.

The abstract, sentence by sentence

arXiv listing abstract v2. Results and the main claim are underlined; .

Quantum computers may achieve speedups over their classical counterparts for solving linear algebra problems. However, in some cases -- such as for low-rank matrices -- dequantized algorithms demonstrate that there cannot be an exponential quantum speedup. In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems \update{if there is no restriction on the rank}. We mainly focus on solving linear regression and Hamiltonian simulation. In the quantum case, the task is to prepare the quantum state of the result. To allow for a fair comparison, in the classical case, the task is to sample from the result. We investigate these two problems in two-party and multiparty models, propose near-optimal quantum protocols and prove quantum/classical lower bounds. In this process, we propose an efficient quantum protocol for quantum singular value transformation, which is a powerful technique for designing quantum algorithms. This will be helpful in developing efficient quantum protocols for many other problems.

background contribution method result interpretation main claim

What the classifier reports for each sentence. The number is the probability it gave the label.
#sentencerolethe authors' own workstates the main conclusionstrength
s0 Quantum computers may achieve speedups over their classical counterparts for solving linear algebra problems. background 1.00 0.05 0.04 hedged possibility 1.00
s1 However, in some cases -- such as for low-rank matrices -- dequantized algorithms demonstrate that there cannot be an exponential quantum speedup. background 0.96 0.05 0.03 asserted 1.00
s2 In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems \update{if there is no restriction on the rank}. contribution 0.57 0.93 0.86 asserted 1.00
s3 We mainly focus on solving linear regression and Hamiltonian simulation. contribution 0.98 0.71 0.06 asserted 0.92
s4 In the quantum case, the task is to prepare the quantum state of the result. method 0.72 0.24 0.04 asserted 1.00
s5 To allow for a fair comparison, in the classical case, the task is to sample from the result. method 0.94 0.69 0.02 asserted 0.98
s6 We investigate these two problems in two-party and multiparty models, propose near-optimal quantum protocols and prove quantum/classical lower bounds. contribution 0.88 0.95 0.22 asserted 1.00
s7 In this process, we propose an efficient quantum protocol for quantum singular value transformation, which is a powerful technique for designing quantum algorithms. contribution 0.69 0.93 0.05 asserted 1.00
s8 This will be helpful in developing efficient quantum protocols for many other problems. interpretation 0.79 0.28 0.04 hedged possibility 0.56

What kind of paper the classifier reports this is: theoretical result 0.93 · evidence from proof or derivation 1.00.

What was examined, and what was not

sources read
  • arXiv listing abstract v2
not examined
  • full text
  • figures and tables
  • references and citing sentences
  • relations to other papers
levels run
  • P abstract
not run
  • S sections
  • T body sentences
  • C citations
  • R cross-paper relations

Every quoted sentence on this record is the authors'. Every label is from Pith's closed vocabulary, with the probability shown beside it. Every number in the measurements table is the authors', checked by code. Record as JSON

The paper
Original abstract

Quantum computers may achieve speedups over their classical counterparts for solving linear algebra problems. However, in some cases -- such as for low-rank matrices -- dequantized algorithms demonstrate that there cannot be an exponential quantum speedup. In this work, we show that quantum computers have provable polynomial and exponential speedups in terms of communication complexity for some fundamental linear algebra problems \update{if there is no restriction on the rank}. We mainly focus on solving linear regression and Hamiltonian simulation. In the quantum case, the task is to prepare the quantum state of the result. To allow for a fair comparison, in the classical case, the task is to sample from the result. We investigate these two problems in two-party and multiparty models, propose near-optimal quantum protocols and prove quantum/classical lower bounds. In this process, we propose an efficient quantum protocol for quantum singular value transformation, which is a powerful technique for designing quantum algorithms. This will be helpful in developing efficient quantum protocols for many other problems.

Human review
References
How the literature uses it

9 arXiv papers cite this in 16 sentences

Each citing sentence is taken from the citing paper's LaTeX source and typed by Pith's classifier. A label appears at probability 0.8 or more (0.95 for support), a contest at 0.7 or more; the quoted words are the citing authors'. How each label was checked · JSON

Papers citing it · 8 sentences without a confident label

Cites it as background 6 papers
  • Such architectures offer a natural route towards computation beyond the capabilities of any single device [ref] , with proposed applications spanning factoring [ref] , machine learning [ref] , sensing [ref] , phase estimation [ref] and error correction [ref] , among others [ref] .

    Distributed Trotterization with optimal time-scaling entanglement cost · Introduction · 0.84

  • Previous work has demonstrated quantum linear regression [ref] , regression with quantum neural networks [ref] , a quantum fuzzy regression model [ref] , quantum-assisted regression [ref] , and quantum extreme learning machines [ref] , where quantum algorithms are used to accelerate the training of classical regression models.

    Benchmarking of quantum fidelity kernels for Gaussian process regression · Introduction · 0.98

  • Distributed quantum computing has attracted a lot of attention in recent years [ref] due to the rapid progress in quantum communication technologies.

    Blind quantum machine learning with quantum bipartite correlator · Introduction · 0.92

What it cites · 1 sentence without a confident label

Compares with 1 paper

Discussion

Know something about this paper? Leave a comment, or highlight any passage above to comment on it.