Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Distillation-Resistant Watermarking for Model Protection in NLP

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.03312 v2 pith:KRM33ZTE submitted 2022-10-07 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelmodelswatermarkingdistillation-resistantoriginalprotectprotectionprotects
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

How can we protect the intellectual property of trained NLP models? Modern NLP models are prone to stealing by querying and distilling from their publicly exposed APIs. However, existing protection methods such as watermarking only work for images but are not applicable to text. We propose Distillation-Resistant Watermarking (DRW), a novel technique to protect NLP models from being stolen via distillation. DRW protects a model by injecting watermarks into the victim's prediction probability corresponding to a secret key and is able to detect such a key by probing a suspect model. We prove that a protected model still retains the original accuracy within a certain bound. We evaluate DRW on a diverse set of NLP tasks including text classification, part-of-speech tagging, and named entity recognition. Experiments show that DRW protects the original model and detects stealing suspects at 100% mean average precision for all four tasks while the prior method fails on two.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Invisible Tokens, Visible Bills: The Urgent Need to Audit Hidden Operations in Opaque LLM Services

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    A taxonomy and auditing framework for hidden operations that opaque LLM APIs bill users for, with proposals for commitment-based, predictive, behavioral, and hardware-based verification.

Pith tools