Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Relational Attention: Generalizing Transformers for Graph-Structured Tasks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.05062 v3 pith:DXFPBL6O submitted 2022-10-11 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords graph-structuredattentionentitiesrelationaltransformertransformersdataposition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Transformers flexibly operate over sets of real-valued vectors representing task-specific entities and their attributes, where each vector might encode one word-piece token and its position in a sequence, or some piece of information that carries no position at all. But as set processors, transformers are at a disadvantage in reasoning over more general graph-structured data where nodes represent entities and edges represent relations between entities. To address this shortcoming, we generalize transformer attention to consider and update edge vectors in each transformer layer. We evaluate this relational transformer on a diverse array of graph-structured tasks, including the large and challenging CLRS Algorithmic Reasoning Benchmark. There, it dramatically outperforms state-of-the-art graph neural networks expressly designed to reason over graph-structured data. Our analysis demonstrates that these gains are attributable to relational attention's inherent ability to leverage the greater expressivity of graphs over sets.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Can this Model Also Recognize Dogs? Zero-Shot Model Search from Weights

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    ProbeLog represents each classifier output by its responses to fixed probe images and uses CLIP to answer text queries, achieving 43.8% top-1 accuracy when searching 1,500 ImageNet-trained models for a concept.

Pith tools