REVIEW 2 cited by
Model Cascading: Towards Jointly Improving Efficiency and Accuracy of NLP Systems
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Do all instances need inference through the big models for a correct prediction? Perhaps not; some instances are easy and can be answered correctly by even small capacity models. This provides opportunities for improving the computational efficiency of systems. In this work, we present an explorative study on 'model cascading', a simple technique that utilizes a collection of models of varying capacities to accurately yet efficiently output predictions. Through comprehensive experiments in multiple task settings that differ in the number of models available for cascading (K value), we show that cascading improves both the computational efficiency and the prediction accuracy. For instance, in K=3 setting, cascading saves up to 88.93% computation cost and consistently achieves superior prediction accuracy with an improvement of up to 2.18%. We also study the impact of introducing additional models in the cascade and show that it further increases the efficiency improvements. Finally, we hope that our work will facilitate development of efficient NLP systems making their widespread adoption in real-world applications possible.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
KiC: Keyword-inspired Cascade for Cost-Efficient Text Generation with LLMs
KiC routes easy queries away from GPT-4 by measuring keyword-level consistency among GPT-3.5-turbo responses, cutting costs while keeping accuracy high.
-
T-TAMER: Provably Taming Trade-offs in ML Serving
T-TAMER claims recall is necessary and sufficient for provably optimal early-exit and cascade serving policies, but the main extensions are under-derived and partly reduce to known Gittins-index results.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.