Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Learning to Efficiently Plan Robust Frictional Multi-Object Grasps

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.07420 v3 pith:2P4R5WOO submitted 2022-10-13 cs.RO cs.AIcs.LG

classification cs.ROcs.AIcs.LG
keywords increasemulti-objectgraspsgraspinghourpickscomparedefficiently
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We consider a decluttering problem where multiple rigid convex polygonal objects rest in randomly placed positions and orientations on a planar surface and must be efficiently transported to a packing box using both single and multi-object grasps. Prior work considered frictionless multi-object grasping. In this paper, we introduce friction to increase the number of potential grasps for a given group of objects, and thus increase picks per hour. We train a neural network using real examples to plan robust multi-object grasps. In physical experiments, we find a 13.7% increase in success rate, a 1.6x increase in picks per hour, and a 6.3x decrease in grasp planning time compared to prior work on multi-object grasping. Compared to single-object grasping, we find a 3.1x increase in picks per hour.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hearing the Slide: Acoustic-Guided Constraint Learning for Fast Non-Prehensile Transport

    cs.RO 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A contact microphone on a robot tray learns a velocity-dependent friction constraint that reduces object displacement during fast non-prehensile transport by an average of 86% in physical experiments.

Pith tools