Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 cited by

Robustness of cosmic birefringence measurement against Galactic foreground emission and instrumental systematics

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.07655 v2 pith:UMK2AEUB submitted 2022-10-14 astro-ph.CO

classification astro-ph.CO
keywords birefringenceforegroundcosmicemissiondusteffectsgalacticlike
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The polarization of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) can be used to search for parity-violating processes like that predicted by a Chern-Simons coupling to a light pseudoscalar field. Such an interaction rotates $E$ modes into $B$ modes in the observed CMB signal by an effect known as cosmic birefringence. Even though isotropic birefringence can be confused with the rotation produced by a miscalibration of the detectors' polarization angles the degeneracy between both effects is broken when Galactic foreground emission is used as a calibrator. In this work, we use realistic simulations of the High-Frequency Instrument of the Planck mission to test the impact that Galactic foreground emission and instrumental systematics have on the recent birefringence measurements obtained through this technique. Our results demonstrate the robustness of the methodology against the miscalibration of polarization angles and other systematic effects, like intensity-to-polarization leakage, beam leakage, or cross-polarization effects. However, our estimator is sensitive to the $EB$ correlation of polarized foreground emission. Here we propose to correct the bias induced by dust $EB$ by modeling the foreground signal with templates produced in Bayesian component-separation analyses that fit parametric models to CMB data. Acknowledging the limitations of currently available dust templates like that of the Commander sky model, high-precision CMB data and a characterization of dust beyond the modified blackbody paradigm are needed to obtain a definitive measurement of cosmic birefringence in the future.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 5 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Limits on global cosmic birefringence using radio sources

    astro-ph.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    X-band radio sources yield μ_β = (0.2 ± 1.0)° for global cosmic birefringence, with stacking to ~0.6° and a forecast that ~10^5 sources could reach ~0.1° to test Planck claims.

  2. Calibration of CMB Polarisation Using Cross-Experiment Correlations

    astro-ph.CO 2026-06 unverdicted novelty 6.0 of 10

    A data-driven method calibrates relative CMB polarization angles via cross-correlations without assuming zero isotropic birefringence or primordial EB, forecasting 0.10° and 0.17° uncertainties for SO LAT and Planck a...

  3. Theoretical and Observational Bounds on Dynamical Chern-Simons Gravity as an Effective Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-04 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    Dynamical Chern-Simons gravity is bounded by causality and perturbativity to produce only tiny corrections on macroscopic gravitational systems.

  4. Theoretical and Observational Bounds on Dynamical Chern-Simons Gravity as an Effective Field Theory

    hep-th 2026-04 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Causality from Shapiro delay and UV species/perturbativity bounds force the dynamical Chern-Simons coupling to be tiny for macroscopic gravitational systems.

  5. Cosmic Birefringence from the Atacama Cosmology Telescope Data Release 6

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Bayesian analysis of ACT DR6 CMB polarization data measures cosmic birefringence angle β = 0.215° ± 0.074° excluding zero at 2.9σ, consistent with prior WMAP and Planck results but limited by unexplained systematics.

Pith tools