pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.07332 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-08 · ✦ hep-th · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· hep-ph

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Theoretical and Observational Bounds on Dynamical Chern-Simons Gravity as an Effective Field Theory

Alexander Cassem , Mark P. Hertzberg
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 18:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-th astro-ph.COgr-qchep-ph
keywords dynamical Chern-Simons gravityeffective field theorycausality boundsunitarityUV completiongravitational wavesblack hole mergersShapiro time delay
0
0 comments X

The pith

Dynamical Chern-Simons gravity corrections must be extremely small on macroscopic scales to satisfy causality and unitarity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes dynamical Chern-Simons gravity, a parity-violating extension of general relativity in which a scalar field couples to the Pontryagin density. It first derives the modified dispersion relation and wave-packet speed on a gravitational-wave background, computes the resulting Shapiro time delay to second order, and shows that superluminality is possible unless the coupling is bounded by causality. It then considers an ultraviolet completion consisting of N fermions with pseudo-Yukawa couplings, imposes perturbativity together with a gravitational species bound, and obtains significantly tighter limits on the coupling that depend on the chosen scale. These results imply that any dynamical Chern-Simons corrections remain negligible in macroscopic systems such as late-time black-hole mergers. A sympathetic reader cares because the bounds restrict how much new physics can appear in gravitational-wave signals without violating fundamental principles.

Core claim

The dispersion relation for waves propagating on a gravitational-wave background in dynamical Chern-Simons gravity produces a second-order correction to the Shapiro time delay that can become superluminal, requiring a causality bound on the coupling constant; a concrete UV completion with N fermions and pseudo-Yukawa interactions then supplies stronger constraints via perturbativity and the gravitational species bound, showing that dynamical Chern-Simons corrections must be very small on macroscopic observational scales.

What carries the argument

The dynamical Chern-Simons coupling constant, bounded by the requirement of subluminal wave-packet speeds and by unitarity in the N-fermion UV completion.

If this is right

  • Causality from the absence of superluminality imposes a moderately sharper but compatible bound on the coupling.
  • The N-fermion UV completion tightens the bound substantially once the species scale is fixed.
  • Integrating out the fermions generates additional higher-order operators in the effective theory.
  • Dynamical Chern-Simons effects are expected to be negligible in late-time black-hole mergers and other systems of observational interest.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Searches for distinctive gravitational-wave signatures from dynamical Chern-Simons gravity in LIGO/Virgo data become unlikely to succeed unless the coupling scale is pushed far beyond current expectations.
  • The same combination of causality and species bounds can be applied to other parity-violating or higher-curvature gravity extensions to restrict their viable parameter space.
  • A direct extension would be to recompute inflationary predictions or late-time cosmology under these tighter limits to check consistency with existing cosmic microwave background data.

Load-bearing premise

The N-fermion model with pseudo-Yukawa coupling supplies a valid UV completion and the chosen scale for the gravitational species bound is appropriate for constraining the effective theory.

What would settle it

An observation of superluminal gravitational-wave propagation or of parity-violating signals in black-hole mergers that exceed the derived upper limit on the coupling constant would falsify the claim that dynamical Chern-Simons corrections must remain small.

read the original abstract

Gravitational effective theories are essential for characterizing the space of deviations from General Relativity (GR). Testing these theories against fundamental principles, such as causality and unitarity, can yield constraints on the corresponding parameters. In this paper, we perform such an analysis on the very interesting dynamical Chern-Simons (dCS) gravity. This is a parity violating correction to GR wherein a new scalar field couples to the Pontryagin density $^*R\,R$. It has generated significant interest, including possible new gravitational wave shapes for LIGO/Virgo and new phenomena from cosmic inflation. In this work, we begin by deriving the dispersion relation and wave packet speed on top of a gravitational wave background in dCS gravity. This alters the corresponding Shapiro time delay (which we compute to second order), potentially giving superluminality. Causality then demands a bound on the dCS coupling constant, which we find to be moderately sharper, but compatible with, standard estimates. We then examine a UV completion in the form of a set of $N$ fermions with a (pseudo) Yukawa coupling. By imposing perturbativity and a gravitational species bound, we find that the dCS coupling constant is constrained significantly more, depending on the choice of scale of the species bound. We also identify higher order operators generated from the UV completion. Overall, we find that any dCS corrections to gravitational dynamics should likely be very small on macroscopic systems of observational interest, such as in late-time merging black holes.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes dynamical Chern-Simons (dCS) gravity as an EFT. It derives the dispersion relation and wave-packet speed for gravitational waves propagating on a GW background, computes the second-order Shapiro time delay, and imposes causality to obtain a bound on the dCS coupling that is moderately sharper than but compatible with existing estimates. A UV completion consisting of N fermions with (pseudo)Yukawa couplings is then introduced; perturbativity together with a gravitational species bound yields a significantly tighter constraint whose numerical value depends on the choice of species scale. Higher-dimension operators generated by the completion are identified. The central conclusion is that dCS corrections to gravitational dynamics must be very small on macroscopic systems of observational interest such as late-time black-hole mergers.

Significance. If the derived bounds are robust, the work supplies concrete theoretical limits that render observable deviations from GR in LIGO/Virgo-scale black-hole mergers unlikely, thereby sharpening the target for future gravitational-wave tests of parity violation. The explicit second-order calculation of the time delay and the systematic treatment of the UV completion provide reusable technical tools for similar EFT analyses in gravity. The paper also correctly flags the scale dependence of its strongest bound, which is a transparent limitation rather than a hidden flaw.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and concluding section: the claim that 'any dCS corrections to gravitational dynamics should likely be very small on macroscopic systems of observational interest, such as in late-time merging black holes' rests on the tighter UV-derived bound. The abstract itself states that this limit 'depends on the choice of scale of the species bound.' Because the species scale can be chosen anywhere between the EFT cutoff and the Planck scale, other plausible choices relax the numerical bound by orders of magnitude and reopen the possibility of observable effects in late-time mergers. This choice is therefore load-bearing for the strongest phenomenological conclusion.
  2. [UV completion analysis] UV-completion section: the perturbativity assumption used to extract the bound from the N-fermion completion is potentially compromised by the higher-dimension operators that the same completion generates. The manuscript notes their existence but does not demonstrate that they remain suppressed at the same scale as the dCS operator; if they are not, the perturbative treatment underlying the bound is invalidated.
minor comments (2)
  1. The introduction would benefit from an explicit equation defining the dCS action (scalar coupling to *RR) before the dispersion-relation calculation begins, to aid readers who are not already expert in the model.
  2. A short table comparing the new causality bound, the UV bound for representative scale choices, and existing literature bounds would make the quantitative improvement easier to assess.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and concluding section: the claim that 'any dCS corrections to gravitational dynamics should likely be very small on macroscopic systems of observational interest, such as in late-time merging black holes' rests on the tighter UV-derived bound. The abstract itself states that this limit 'depends on the choice of scale of the species bound.' Because the species scale can be chosen anywhere between the EFT cutoff and the Planck scale, other plausible choices relax the numerical bound by orders of magnitude and reopen the possibility of observable effects in late-time mergers. This choice is therefore load-bearing for the strongest phenomenological conclusion.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. The abstract and conclusion already note the dependence on the species scale, and the word 'likely' is chosen to reflect that the tightest bound follows from taking the species scale near the EFT cutoff (a standard choice in such completions). Nevertheless, to make the dependence fully transparent, we will revise the abstract and concluding section to explicitly tabulate or describe the numerical bounds for species scales ranging from the cutoff to the Planck scale, and to qualify the implications for observability in late-time mergers. This is a clarification rather than a change in the underlying analysis. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [UV completion analysis] UV-completion section: the perturbativity assumption used to extract the bound from the N-fermion completion is potentially compromised by the higher-dimension operators that the same completion generates. The manuscript notes their existence but does not demonstrate that they remain suppressed at the same scale as the dCS operator; if they are not, the perturbative treatment underlying the bound is invalidated.

    Authors: This is a fair criticism. The manuscript identifies the higher-dimension operators but does not provide an explicit suppression argument. These operators arise at higher orders in the 1/Λ expansion (dimension six and above) and are therefore suppressed by additional powers of the cutoff relative to the leading dCS operator. Within the regime of validity of the EFT, their contributions remain negligible and do not invalidate the perturbativity condition. In the revised manuscript we will add a short scaling argument or paragraph demonstrating this suppression to confirm the validity of the bound. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bounds derived from external causality, perturbativity, and chosen UV completion without reduction to tautology.

full rationale

The derivation begins with explicit computation of the dispersion relation and second-order Shapiro time delay in dCS gravity on a GW background, leading to a causality bound on the coupling. This is followed by analysis of an N-fermion UV completion with (pseudo)Yukawa interactions, imposing perturbativity and the gravitational species bound to obtain a tighter limit (explicitly noted to depend on species scale choice). Higher-dimension operators are identified as a consistency check. None of these steps reduce by construction to the inputs via self-definition, fitted predictions renamed as outputs, or load-bearing self-citations. The scale dependence is an acknowledged modeling choice, not a circularity. The central claim remains independent of the target result and is self-contained against external benchmarks like causality and unitarity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard causality and unitarity requirements of effective field theory plus the assumption that the chosen UV completion is representative.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Causality forbids superluminal propagation of gravitational waves
    Invoked to translate the computed wave-packet speed into a bound on the dCS coupling.
  • domain assumption Perturbativity must hold in the UV completion
    Used together with the gravitational species bound to constrain the coupling.
invented entities (1)
  • dynamical scalar field coupled to Pontryagin density no independent evidence
    purpose: Provides the parity-violating correction in dCS gravity
    Core ingredient of the effective theory being bounded; no independent evidence supplied beyond the model itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1341 out tokens · 41944 ms · 2026-05-10T18:08:26.566083+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Lee and C.N

    T.D. Lee and C.N. Yang,Question of parity conservation in weak interactions,Physical Review104(1956) 254

    1956

  2. [2]

    C.S. Wu, E. Ambler, R.W. Hayward, D.D. Hoppes and R.P. Hudson,Experimental Test of Parity Conservation inβDecay,Phys. Rev.105(1957) 1413

    1957

  3. [3]

    An Improved Experimental Limit on the Electric Dipole Moment of the Neutron

    C.A.B. et al.,An improved experimental limit on the electric dipole moment of the neutron, Physical Review Letters97(2006) 131801 [hep-ex/0602020]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  4. [4]

    et al.,Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron,Phys

    C.A. et al.,Measurement of the permanent electric dipole moment of the neutron,Phys. Rev. Lett.124(2020) 081803

    2020

  5. [5]

    Coulton, O.H.E

    W.R. Coulton, O.H.E. Philcox and F. Villaescusa-Navarro,Signatures of a parity-violating universe, Phys. Rev. D109(2024) 023531 [2306.11782]

    work page arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Diego-Palazuelos et al.,Robustness of cosmic birefringence measurement against Galactic foreground emission and instrumental systematics,JCAP01(2023) 044 [2210.07655]

    P. Diego-Palazuelos et al.,Robustness of cosmic birefringence measurement against Galactic foreground emission and instrumental systematics,JCAP01(2023) 044 [2210.07655]

    work page arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    J. Hou, Z. Slepian and R.N. Cahn,Measurement of parity-odd modes in the large-scale 4-point correlation function of Sloan Digital Sky Survey Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey twelfth data release CMASS and LOWZ galaxies,Mon. Not. Roy.Astron. Soc.522 (2023) 5701 [2206.03625]

    work page arXiv 2023

  8. [8]

    Minami and E

    Y. Minami and E. Komatsu,New Extraction of the Cosmic Birefringence from the Planck 2018 Polarization Data,Phys. Rev. Lett.125(2020) 221301 [2011.11254]

    work page arXiv 2018

  9. [9]

    Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies, Phys

    O.H.E. Philcox,Probing parity violation with the four-point correlation function of BOSS galaxies, Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 063501 [2206.04227]

    work page arXiv 2022

  10. [10]

    Creque-Sarbinowski, S

    C. Creque-Sarbinowski, S. Alexander, M. Kamionkowski and O. Philcox,Parity-violating trispectrum from Chern-Simons gravity,JCAP11(2023) 029 [2303.04815]

    work page arXiv 2023

  11. [11]

    Fujita, T

    T. Fujita, T. Murata, I. Obata and M. Shiraishi,Parity-violating scalar trispectrum from a rolling axion during inflation,2310.03551

    work page arXiv

  12. [12]

    No evidence for parity violation in BOSS

    A. Krolewski, S. May, K. Smith and H. Hopkins,No evidence for parity violation in BOSS, JCAP08(2024) 044 [2407.03397]

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Cabass, S

    G. Cabass, S. Jazayeri, E. Pajer and D. Stefanyszyn,Parity violation in the scalar trispectrum: no-go theorems and yes-go examples,JHEP02(2023) 021 [2210.02907]

    work page arXiv 2023

  14. [14]

    Thavanesan,No-go Theorem for Cosmological Parity Violation,2501.06383

    A. Thavanesan,No-go Theorem for Cosmological Parity Violation,2501.06383

    work page arXiv

  15. [15]

    Jackiw and S.Y

    R. Jackiw and S.Y. Pi,Chern-Simons modification of general relativity,Phys. Rev. D68 (2003) 104012 [gr-qc/0308071]. – 30 –

    work page arXiv 2003

  16. [16]

    Alexander and N

    S. Alexander and N. Yunes,Chern-Simons Modified General Relativity,Phys. Rept.480 (2009) 1 [0907.2562]

    work page arXiv 2009

  17. [17]

    Causality, Analyticity and an IR Obstruction to UV Completion

    A. Adams, N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dubovsky, A. Nicolis and R. Rattazzi,Causality, analyticity and an IR obstruction to UV completion,JHEP10(2006) 014 [hep-th/0602178]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2006

  18. [18]

    Herrero-Valea, A.S

    M. Herrero-Valea, A.S. Koshelev and A. Tokareva,UV graviton scattering and positivity bounds from IR dispersion relations,Phys. Rev. D106(2022) 105002 [2205.13332]

    work page arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Platania,Causality, unitarity and stability in quantum gravity: a non-perturbative perspective,JHEP09(2022) 167 [2206.04072]

    A. Platania,Causality, unitarity and stability in quantum gravity: a non-perturbative perspective,JHEP09(2022) 167 [2206.04072]

    work page arXiv 2022

  20. [20]

    de Rham, S

    C. de Rham, S. Jaitly and A.J. Tolley,Constraints on Regge behavior from IR physics,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 046011 [2212.04975]

    work page arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Hong, Z.-H

    D.-Y. Hong, Z.-H. Wang and S.-Y. Zhou,Causality bounds on scalar-tensor EFTs,JHEP10 (2023) 135 [2304.01259]

    work page arXiv 2023

  22. [22]

    Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity

    B. Bellazzini, C. Cheung and G.N. Remmen,Quantum Gravity Constraints from Unitarity and Analyticity,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 064076 [1509.00851]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  23. [23]

    Hamada, R

    Y. Hamada, R. Kuramochi, G.J. Loges and S. Nakajima,On (scalar QED) gravitational positivity bounds,JHEP05(2023) 076 [2301.01999]

    work page arXiv 2023

  24. [24]

    Gruzinov and M

    A. Gruzinov and M. Kleban,Causality Constrains Higher Curvature Corrections to Gravity, Class. Quant. Grav.24(2007) 3521 [hep-th/0612015]

    work page arXiv 2007

  25. [25]

    Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling

    X.O. Camanho, J.D. Edelstein, J. Maldacena and A. Zhiboedov,Causality Constraints on Corrections to the Graviton Three-Point Coupling,JHEP02(2016) 020 [1407.5597]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Caron-Huot, Y.-Z

    S. Caron-Huot, Y.-Z. Li, J. Parra-Martinez and D. Simmons-Duffin,Causality constraints on corrections to Einstein gravity,JHEP05(2023) 122 [2201.06602]

    work page arXiv 2023

  27. [27]

    Horowitz, M

    G.T. Horowitz, M. Kolanowski, G.N. Remmen and J.E. Santos,Sudden breakdown of effective field theory near cool Kerr-Newman black holes,JHEP05(2024) 122 [2403.00051]

    work page arXiv 2024

  28. [28]

    Cassem and M.P

    A. Cassem and M.P. Hertzberg,Unitarity, causality, and solar system bounds may significantly limit the use of gravitational waves to test general relativity,JHEP11(2025) 144 [2408.12118]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Hertzberg, R

    M.P. Hertzberg, R. Nathan and S.E. Semaan,Solar System constraints on light propagation from higher derivative corrections to general relativity and implications for fundamental physics, Phys. Rev. D112(2025) 064078 [2503.19236]. [30]LIGO Scientific Collaboration and Virgo Collaborationcollaboration, Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black ...

    work page arXiv 2025

  30. [30]

    Theoretical Physics Implications of the Binary Black-Hole Mergers GW150914 and GW151226

    N. Yunes, K. Yagi and F. Pretorius,Theoretical physics implications of the binary black-hole mergers gw150914 and gw151226,Phys. Rev. D94(2016) 084002 [1603.08955]. – 31 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2016

  31. [31]

    Numerical binary black hole mergers in dynamical Chern-Simons: I. Scalar field

    M. Okounkova, L.C. Stein, M.A. Scheel, D.A. Hemberger and H.P. Pfeiffer,Numerical binary black hole mergers in dynamical chern-simons gravity: Scalar field,Phys. Rev. D96(2017) 044020 [1705.07924]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2017

  32. [32]

    Perkins, H.O

    S.E. Perkins, H.O. Silva and N. Yunes,Improved gravitational-wave constraints on higher-curvature gravity,Phys. Rev. D103(2021) 044024 [2011.08875]

    work page arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    Chung and N

    A.K.-W. Chung and N. Yunes,Black hole ringdown tests of dynamical chern-simons gravity with ligo-virgo-kagra,2506.14695

    work page arXiv

  34. [34]

    Gravitational Wave Tests of General Relativity with Ground-Based Detectors and Pulsar Timing Arrays

    N. Yunes and X. Siemens,Gravitational-wave tests of general relativity with ground-based detectors and pulsar timing arrays,Living Rev. Rel.16(2013) 9 [1304.3473]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Kabat and M

    D.N. Kabat and M. Ortiz,Eikonal quantum gravity and Planckian scattering,Nucl. Phys. B 388(1992) 570 [hep-th/9203082]

    work page arXiv 1992

  36. [36]

    Amati, M

    D. Amati, M. Ciafaloni and G. Veneziano,Planckian scattering beyond the semiclassical approximation, Phys. Lett. B289(1992) 87

    1992

  37. [37]

    Accettulli Huber, A

    M. Accettulli Huber, A. Brandhuber, S. De Angelis and G. Travaglini,Eikonal phase matrix, deflection angle and time delay in effective field theories of gravity,Phys. Rev. D102(2020) 046014 [2006.02375]

    work page arXiv 2020

  38. [38]

    Serra, J

    F. Serra, J. Serra, E. Trincherini and L.G. Trombetta,Causality constraints on black holes beyond GR,JHEP08(2022) 157 [2205.08551]

    work page arXiv 2022

  39. [39]

    Z. Xu, J. Hong, B. Wang and S.-Y. Zhou,Positivity bounds on parity-violating scalar-tensor effective field theories,2410.09794

    work page arXiv

  40. [40]

    Z. Dong, J. Jeong and A. Pomarol,Causal bounds on EFTs with anomalies with a pseudoscalar, photons, and gravitons,JHEP02(2026) 102 [2510.12138]

    work page arXiv 2026

  41. [41]

    Alexander, H

    S. Alexander, H. Bernardo and N. Yunes,Can weak-gravity, causality-violation arguments constrain modified gravity?,2506.14889

    work page arXiv

  42. [42]

    Garfinkle, F

    D. Garfinkle, F. Pretorius and N. Yunes,Linear Stability Analysis and the Speed of Gravitational Waves in Dynamical Chern-Simons Modified Gravity,Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 041501 [1007.2429]

    work page arXiv 2010

  43. [43]

    Ayzenberg, K

    D. Ayzenberg, K. Yagi and N. Yunes,Linear Stability Analysis of Dynamical Quadratic Gravity, Phys. Rev. D89(2014) 044023 [1310.6392]

    work page arXiv 2014

  44. [44]

    Shore,Faster than light photons in gravitational fields

    G.M. Shore,Faster than light photons in gravitational fields. 2. Dispersion and vacuum polarization, Nucl. Phys. B633(2002) 271 [gr-qc/0203034]

    work page arXiv 2002

  45. [45]

    Shore,Superluminality and UV completion,Nucl

    G.M. Shore,Superluminality and UV completion,Nucl. Phys. B778(2007) 219 [hep-th/0701185]

    work page arXiv 2007

  46. [46]

    The Invar tensor package,

    J.M. Martin-Garcia, R. Portugal and L.R.U. Manssur,The Invar tensor package,Comput. Phys. Commun.177(2007) 640 [0704.1756]

    work page arXiv 2007

  47. [47]

    The Invar tensor package: Dif- ferential invariants of Riemann,

    J.M. Martin-Garcia, D. Yllanes and R. Portugal,The Invar tensor package: Differential invariants of Riemann,Comput. Phys. Commun.179(2008) 586 [0802.1274]

    work page arXiv 2008

  48. [48]

    xPerm: fast index canonicalization for tensor computer alge- bra,

    J.M. Martín-García,xPerm: fast index canonicalization for tensor computer algebra, Comput. Phys. Commun.179(2008) 597 [0803.0862]

    work page arXiv 2008

  49. [49]

    xPert: Computer algebra for metric perturbation theory

    D. Brizuela, J.M. Martin-Garcia and G.A. Mena Marugan,xPert: Computer algebra for metric perturbation theory,Gen. Rel. Grav.41(2009) 2415 [0807.0824]. – 32 –

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

  50. [50]

    Nutma,xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica,Comput

    T. Nutma,xTras : A field-theory inspired xAct package for mathematica,Comput. Phys. Commun.185(2014) 1719 [1308.3493]

    work page arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press (3, 2014), 10.1017/9781139540940

    M.D. Schwartz,Quantum Field Theory and the Standard Model, Cambridge University Press (3, 2014), 10.1017/9781139540940

    work page doi:10.1017/9781139540940 2014

  52. [52]

    Misyura,Second-Order Effects in Gravitational Wave Spacetime,2505.01878

    M.A. Misyura,Second-Order Effects in Gravitational Wave Spacetime,2505.01878

    work page arXiv

  53. [53]

    Brillouin,WavePropagation and Group Velocity, Academic Press, New York (1960)

    L. Brillouin,WavePropagation and Group Velocity, Academic Press, New York (1960)

    1960

  54. [54]

    Toms,Effective action for the Yukawa model in curved spacetime,JHEP05(2018) 139 [1804.08350]

    D.J. Toms,Effective action for the Yukawa model in curved spacetime,JHEP05(2018) 139 [1804.08350]

    work page arXiv 2018

  55. [55]

    Alexander and C

    S. Alexander and C. Creque-Sarbinowski,UV completions of Chern-Simons gravity,Phys. Rev. D108(2023) 104046 [2207.05094]

    work page arXiv 2023

  56. [56]

    ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,Nucl

    G. ’t Hooft,A Planar Diagram Theory for Strong Interactions,Nucl. Phys. B72(1974) 461

    1974

  57. [57]

    Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem

    G. Dvali,Black Holes and Large N Species Solution to the Hierarchy Problem,Fortsch.Phys. 58(2010) 528 [0706.2050]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2010

  58. [58]

    York, Jr.,Covariant decompositions of symmetric tensors in the theory of gravitation, Ann

    J.W. York, Jr.,Covariant decompositions of symmetric tensors in the theory of gravitation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincare Phys. Theor. A21(1974) 319

    1974

  59. [59]

    Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure

    C.G. Tsagas, A. Challinor and R. Maartens,Relativistic cosmology and large-scale structure, Phys. Rept.465(2008) 61 [0705.4397]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2008

  60. [60]

    Functions of Bounded Variation and Free Discontinuity Problems

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves. Vol. 1: Theory and Experiments, Oxford University Press (2007), 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570745.001.0001 2007

  61. [61]

    Figueroa, J

    D.G. Figueroa, J. Garcia-Bellido and A. Rajantie,On the Transverse-Traceless Projection in Lattice Simulations of Gravitational Wave Production,JCAP11(2011) 015 [1110.0337]

    work page arXiv 2011

  62. [62]

    L. Dai, M. Kamionkowski and D. Jeong,Total Angular Momentum Waves for Scalar, Vector, and Tensor Fields,Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 125013 [1209.0761]

    work page arXiv 2012

  63. [63]

    Edgar and A

    S.B. Edgar and A. Hoglund,Dimensionally dependent tensor identities by double antisymmetrization, J. Math. Phys.43(2002) 659 [gr-qc/0105066]

    work page arXiv 2002

  64. [64]

    Misner, K.S

    C.W. Misner, K.S. Thorne and J.A. Wheeler,Gravitation, W. H. Freeman, San Francisco (1973)

    1973

  65. [65]

    Heat kernel expansion: user's manual

    D.V. Vassilevich,Heat kernel expansion: User’s manual,Phys. Rept.388(2003) 279 [hep-th/0306138]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2003

  66. [66]

    Alvarez-Gaume and E

    L. Alvarez-Gaume and E. Witten,Gravitational Anomalies,Nucl. Phys. B234(1984) 269. – 33 –

    1984