REVIEW 1 cited by
Testing Independence of Exchangeable Random Variables
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
Given well-shuffled data, can we determine whether the data items are statistically (in)dependent? Formally, we consider the problem of testing whether a set of exchangeable random variables are independent. We will show that this is possible and develop tests that can confidently reject the null hypothesis that data is independent and identically distributed and have high power for (some) exchangeable distributions. We will make no structural assumptions on the underlying sample space. One potential application is in Deep Learning, where data is often scraped from the whole internet, with duplications abound, which can render data non-iid and test-set evaluation prone to give wrong answers.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
The Cake that is Intelligence and Who Gets to Bake it: An AI Analogy and its Implications for Participation
The authors expand LeCun's cake metaphor to the full AI lifecycle and argue that social outcomes are constrained by technical foundations such as the i.i.d. assumption, homogenization, catastrophic forgetting, and sur...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.