Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

LANS: Large-scale Arabic News Summarization Corpus

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.13600 v1 pith:S5OT6ZHO submitted 2022-10-24 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords lanssummariessummarizationarabicevaluationtextautomaticdataset
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Text summarization has been intensively studied in many languages, and some languages have reached advanced stages. Yet, Arabic Text Summarization (ATS) is still in its developing stages. Existing ATS datasets are either small or lack diversity. We build, LANS, a large-scale and diverse dataset for Arabic Text Summarization task. LANS offers 8.4 million articles and their summaries extracted from newspapers websites metadata between 1999 and 2019. The high-quality and diverse summaries are written by journalists from 22 major Arab newspapers, and include an eclectic mix of at least more than 7 topics from each source. We conduct an intrinsic evaluation on LANS by both automatic and human evaluations. Human evaluation of 1000 random samples reports 95.4% accuracy for our collected summaries, and automatic evaluation quantifies the diversity and abstractness of the summaries. The dataset is publicly available upon request.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Beyond N-Grams: Rethinking Evaluation Metrics and Strategies for Multilingual Abstractive Summarization

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Across eight languages, n-gram metrics such as ROUGE correlate less with human ratings in fusional languages than in isolating and agglutinative ones, while the neural metric COMET correlates better, especially in low...

Pith tools