Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

FO-PINNs: A First-Order formulation for Physics Informed Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2210.14320 v2 pith:EKAX3TQA submitted 2022-10-25 cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA

FO-PINNs: A First-Order formulation for Physics Informed Neural Networks

classification cs.LG cs.NAmath.NA
keywords pinnsfo-pinnsboundarynetworksneuralaccuracyconditionsfirst-order
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved
0 comments
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN
read the original abstract

Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are a class of deep learning neural networks that learn the response of a physical system without any simulation data, and only by incorporating the governing partial differential equations (PDEs) in their loss function. While PINNs are successfully used for solving forward and inverse problems, their accuracy decreases significantly for parameterized systems. PINNs also have a soft implementation of boundary conditions resulting in boundary conditions not being exactly imposed everywhere on the boundary. With these challenges at hand, we present first-order physics-informed neural networks (FO-PINNs). These are PINNs that are trained using a first-order formulation of the PDE loss function. We show that, compared to standard PINNs, FO-PINNs offer significantly higher accuracy in solving parameterized systems, and reduce time-per-iteration by removing the extra backpropagations needed to compute the second or higher-order derivatives. Additionally, FO-PINNs can enable exact imposition of boundary conditions using approximate distance functions, which pose challenges when applied on high-order PDEs. Through three examples, we demonstrate the advantages of FO-PINNs over standard PINNs in terms of accuracy and training speedup.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Discovering Periodic Orbits in the Gravitational Three-Body Problem

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0

    PINNs without initial conditions recover verifiable three-body periodic orbits from sparse noisy data, with training data—not init distribution—controlling which families emerge across seed ensembles.

  2. Continuous Data Assimilation with Learned Surrogate Dynamics

    math.DS 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    Nudging with learned surrogate dynamics converges exponentially to an explicit error floor determined by surrogate error and observation noise, with training data requirements quantified for noise-free cases.