REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimistic and Validity Rollups: Analysis and Comparison between Optimism and StarkNet
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
The thesis addresses the problem of scalability in decentralized blockchains in the context of the trade-off between transaction throughput and hardware requirements to participate in the network. Rollups are presented, that is technologies to verify on-chain blocks executed off-chain by minimizing the assumptions of trust. The variant of the Optimistic Rollups, in particular of Optimism and the use of invalidity proofs through interactive binary search and of the Validity Rollups, in particular of StarkNet, and the use of validity proofs through STARKs are discussed. Finally, the two solutions are compared on withdrawal time, on the cost of transactions and techniques to minimize it, on the possibility of applying the technology recursively, on compatibility with Ethereum and on the licenses used.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
UAT20: Unifying Liquidity Across Rollups
A proposed universal token standard, UAT20, aims to unify ERC20 liquidity across rollups using CRDT state and L1-ordered commits, but the protocol and its empirical support are not fully specified.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.