Pith. sign in

REVIEW

Materials Property Prediction with Uncertainty Quantification: A Benchmark Study

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2211.02235 v2 pith:P4E2QEW7 submitted 2022-11-04 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.LG

classification cond-mat.mtrl-scics.LG
keywords materialsuncertaintypredictionpropertyenergymethodsactivedata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Uncertainty quantification (UQ) has increasing importance in building robust high-performance and generalizable materials property prediction models. It can also be used in active learning to train better models by focusing on getting new training data from uncertain regions. There are several categories of UQ methods each considering different types of uncertainty sources. Here we conduct a comprehensive evaluation on the UQ methods for graph neural network based materials property prediction and evaluate how they truly reflect the uncertainty that we want in error bound estimation or active learning. Our experimental results over four crystal materials datasets (including formation energy, adsorption energy, total energy, and band gap properties) show that the popular ensemble methods for uncertainty estimation is NOT the best choice for UQ in materials property prediction. For the convenience of the community, all the source code and data sets can be accessed freely at \url{https://github.com/usccolumbia/materialsUQ}.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools